Mailing-List: contact dev-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@accumulo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of josh.elser@gmail.com designates
 209.85.192.48 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <5386A460.7060206@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 23:07:12 -0400
From: Josh Elser <josh.elser@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9;
 rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@accumulo.apache.org
Subject: Re: State of ACCUMULO-378 -- Replication
References: <53853050.2030505@gmail.com>
	<CAOiJXP7UWpA3yfhb2Ymedeyqq1XYqcYG2JBHSdKAhcgu2w7ckw@mail.gmail.com>
	<538538E9.3040705@gmail.com>
	<CAD-fFULZ5af0ZiaCFdtwTrCAgovuwfBPWoEJ6xRA-NYU61djTQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGUtCHpwMYQZS8czsVEx7qn-y8He=UmyG3=mYaPA_Y6FKc2rnQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <5385F721.1010109@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5385F721.1010109@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 5/28/14, 10:48 AM, Josh Elser wrote:
> On 5/28/14, 9:52 AM, Keith Turner wrote:
>> On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 9:01 AM, Bill Havanki
>> <bhavanki@clouderagovt.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Is it possible to break the review into smaller, easier-to-review
>>> chunks?
>>>
>>
>> I like that.  Could construct a dependency graph of the chunks to be
>> reviewed and post that as a map for us.
>>
>>
>
> I'll see if I can get something up. As Sean asked in IRC yesterday, I
> still need to write user facing documentation too. I also need to
> update/finish my state diagrams that I started way back when, which
> might help in this process.
>
> FWIW, you can already go through the review I have up by breaking it
> into maven modules (e.g. stuff that runs in the master, tserver,
> client-side, etc). I don't think there's anything presently that
> wouldn't make sense across modules (maybe GC and Master interaction --
> those might get combined into one "review").
>
> Also, fair warning, but the breakdown of patches if I try to chunk them
> won't accurately represent how they will be committed to the repo in the
> final iteration. I assume that's fine for people.

Oof, ok, hopefully these are kosher...

"Client" https://reviews.apache.org/r/22003/
Master+GC https://reviews.apache.org/r/22004/
tserver https://reviews.apache.org/r/22005/
high-level tests https://reviews.apache.org/r/22006/