Mailing-List: contact dev-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@accumulo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of josh.elser@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.216.180 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <537F5B04.4020706@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 10:28:20 -0400
From: Josh Elser <josh.elser@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9;
 rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@accumulo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Thinking about 1.5.2
References: <537F5933.40800@gmail.com>
 <428583291.20780220.1400855016355.JavaMail.root@comcast.net>
In-Reply-To: <428583291.20780220.1400855016355.JavaMail.root@comcast.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Dave, can you wrangle these? Add the fixVersion=1.5.2 for still-open 
tickets, re-open closed tickets and add a fixVersion=1.5.2, or make a 
new ticket that references the other tickets that you mention.

If we have them marked in JIRA, it's more likely that someone will get 
them fixed up for 1.5.

On 5/23/14, 10:23 AM, dlmarion@comcast.net wrote:
> There are some fixes that I have been making in 1.6.1 that revolve around the VFS ClassLoader. 1.5 is affected, so these could be backported if someone wants/needs them.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> From: "Josh Elser" <josh.elser@gmail.com>
> To: "dev" <dev@accumulo.apache.org>
> Sent: Friday, May 23, 2014 10:20:35 AM
> Subject: Thinking about 1.5.2
>
> Ladies and gents,
>
> We're coming up on about 2 months since 1.5.1 was cut. I'd like to start
> thinking about 1.5.2. We have 65 issues already resolved which is pretty
> good, IMO. Hopefully this will help kick us into a more regular release
> cadence.
>
> It looks like we have one ticket currently marked as in progress (Sean -
> ACCUMULO-2806, Keith - ACCUMULO-2766, myself - ACCUMULO-2785, as well as
> some patches ACCUMULO-2758 ACCUMULO-2827). What do we think is a
> sufficient time length to get these done? 2 weeks?
>
> How about we try to freeze things on June 9th and get some testing done
> for, hopefully a release in a week or two after that. I'm happy to take
> the RM position on this one again, but would be happy to help someone
> else through it if they're interested as well. Thoughts?
>
> - Josh
>
>