accumulo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Josh Elser <josh.el...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Dev branches reflecting minor/major versions, not bugfixes
Date Mon, 12 May 2014 14:44:20 GMT
On 5/12/14, 10:41 AM, Keith Turner wrote:
> On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 6:54 PM, Josh Elser<josh.elser@gmail.com>  wrote:
>
>> >SGTM. Looks like there aren't currently any fixes of much substance for
>> >1.6.1 presently, but there are a few that would make for a very-low impact
>> >1.6.1, and a good 1.5.2 which also includes the fallout tickets shortly
>> >after 1.5.1. Timeframe looks good to me too.
>> >
>> >If we can get that reduced test burden for "real" bug-fix releases
>> >hammered out, a month sounds good to me.
>
> Rather than reduce the test burden, it would be nice to make the cluster
> testing more automated like you and other have discussed.

I think that would be a good parallel goal, but I would still think that 
7 days of testing for a bug-fix release is excessive. Most times for me 
the pain is getting resources to test for such a long period, not 
necessarily setting up the test.

Mime
View raw message