accumulo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From <dlmar...@comcast.net>
Subject RE: Thinking about 1.5.2
Date Sat, 24 May 2014 00:36:13 GMT
Done, they have been marked for 1.5.2, 1.6.1, and 1.7.0. 3 are resolved already, have the final
patch ready for the 4th.

-----Original Message-----
From: Josh Elser [mailto:josh.elser@gmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, May 23, 2014 12:48 PM
To: dev@accumulo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Thinking about 1.5.2

Thanks, much appreciated.

On 5/23/14, 10:35 AM, dlmarion@comcast.net wrote:
> Yeah, I'll get to it this weekend.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> From: "Josh Elser" <josh.elser@gmail.com>
> To: dev@accumulo.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, May 23, 2014 10:28:20 AM
> Subject: Re: Thinking about 1.5.2
>
> Dave, can you wrangle these? Add the fixVersion=1.5.2 for still-open 
> tickets, re-open closed tickets and add a fixVersion=1.5.2, or make a 
> new ticket that references the other tickets that you mention.
>
> If we have them marked in JIRA, it's more likely that someone will get 
> them fixed up for 1.5.
>
> On 5/23/14, 10:23 AM, dlmarion@comcast.net wrote:
>> There are some fixes that I have been making in 1.6.1 that revolve around the VFS
ClassLoader. 1.5 is affected, so these could be backported if someone wants/needs them.
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>
>> From: "Josh Elser" <josh.elser@gmail.com>
>> To: "dev" <dev@accumulo.apache.org>
>> Sent: Friday, May 23, 2014 10:20:35 AM
>> Subject: Thinking about 1.5.2
>>
>> Ladies and gents,
>>
>> We're coming up on about 2 months since 1.5.1 was cut. I'd like to 
>> start thinking about 1.5.2. We have 65 issues already resolved which 
>> is pretty good, IMO. Hopefully this will help kick us into a more 
>> regular release cadence.
>>
>> It looks like we have one ticket currently marked as in progress 
>> (Sean - ACCUMULO-2806, Keith - ACCUMULO-2766, myself - ACCUMULO-2785, 
>> as well as some patches ACCUMULO-2758 ACCUMULO-2827). What do we 
>> think is a sufficient time length to get these done? 2 weeks?
>>
>> How about we try to freeze things on June 9th and get some testing 
>> done for, hopefully a release in a week or two after that. I'm happy 
>> to take the RM position on this one again, but would be happy to help 
>> someone else through it if they're interested as well. Thoughts?
>>
>> - Josh
>>
>>
>
>


Mime
View raw message