Mailing-List: contact dev-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@accumulo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of busbey@cloudera.com designates
 209.85.216.182 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAOiJXP7zva01A=NQB_DU=ELmhn0MdvtSKZiYjoCwgaK=k=eEuQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAOiJXP6M89Ftr_CCXjJPU_i6d=YRZtLiLPd5gufLusz+dE2GBg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAOiJXP7zva01A=NQB_DU=ELmhn0MdvtSKZiYjoCwgaK=k=eEuQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 23:29:38 -0500
Message-ID: 
 <CAGHyZ6LvGG5SHQK7jms_=FS3jLFRb-pAshmBQF3qaL+9zhCvsg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: 551 JIRA Tickets Over 2 Years Old
From: Sean Busbey <busbey@cloudera.com>
To: "dev@accumulo apache. org" <dev@accumulo.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1133e4cad3341204f75db6d2

--001a1133e4cad3341204f75db6d2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

+1

Actually. Anything with out a fixVersion in 1.5+ should be flagged to make
sure it's still an issue.

-- 
Sean
On Apr 18, 2014 11:03 PM, "David Medinets" <david.medinets@gmail.com> wrote:

> Opps. Sorry, I did my filtering badly. There are 68 tickets over 2 years
> old.
>
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-18?jql=project%20%3D%20ACCUMULO%20AND%20status%20in%20%28Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened%2C%20%22Patch%20Available%22%29%20AND%20created%20%3C%3D%20-104w%20ORDER%20BY%20key%20ASC
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 12:01 AM, David Medinets
> <david.medinets@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-551?jql=project%20%3D%20ACCUMULO%20AND%20created%20%3C%3D%20-104w%20ORDER%20BY%20key%20DESC
> >
> > Is there a technique we can use to curate old tickets? Would anyone mind
> > if I review them and nominate tickets for closure? I can add a message
> and
> > delete any tickets that don't provoke a response. How useful are tickets
> > that are two years old?
> >
>

--001a1133e4cad3341204f75db6d2--