Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F32A810D2E for ; Fri, 4 Apr 2014 18:03:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 43569 invoked by uid 500); 4 Apr 2014 18:03:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 43535 invoked by uid 500); 4 Apr 2014 18:03:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@accumulo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 43522 invoked by uid 99); 4 Apr 2014 18:03:14 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Apr 2014 18:03:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of busbey@cloudera.com designates 209.85.216.170 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.170] (HELO mail-qc0-f170.google.com) (209.85.216.170) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Apr 2014 18:03:10 +0000 Received: by mail-qc0-f170.google.com with SMTP id x13so3889857qcv.15 for ; Fri, 04 Apr 2014 11:02:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=Vcd/CSsq+vgWS5DLkDr2TSwR5/nhYC7Uz/zTpbpsR6k=; b=PPLZuhckfAjGda/PvRwH5XgMxu6AwaPtE+3+BqB/qEJtChVOmK2h/hokvqBoqYW5AB TyeHbupCtBvHrhQN4f8SCJ9qPDs9XRdW5gO/QZMLyoBP6R8tc8ViPz5eI2j2Y5m9/Qa4 n89NJiZSA3PHvm8U78SUuFUP0pSKT7MW4KpF9OPn/7xPqAdPuzZ53LE8oqL/rp5DAjgn wskeQGQ26hOkMUILGTnP6ZvsTJ09JNfcDAoy46nnJSz9Pxrveaa+CNIsov1i5xkfi5Gg jQLZXBnK+Dkgm2PsJRqglbyoUthXNb2EJvarHG59Z8sl5aTuW3GWBur9TvOtb2mMEHce sNzg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnYRSd5dIJ09u6Xac2p0DnoT0E4IM1QsT99/ttOb549PucQoTqyyu9c5bVCt5aVNk2mMsek X-Received: by 10.224.29.141 with SMTP id q13mr16617391qac.8.1396634569703; Fri, 04 Apr 2014 11:02:49 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.232.65 with HTTP; Fri, 4 Apr 2014 11:02:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Sean Busbey Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2014 13:02:29 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Remove hadoop1 support To: "dev@accumulo apache. org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bf0cbb2689a0c04f63b531c X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --047d7bf0cbb2689a0c04f63b531c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Mike, as of which version is HBase dropping? I wouldn't want to do this in 1.6.x. Presumably that would mean if we drop it in the next version, we'd still be supporting Hadoop 1 until both 1.5 and 1.6 have been EOLd? -Sean On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Mike Drob wrote: > HBase has started to drop hadoop 1 support already. > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 10:54 AM, John Vines wrote: > > > This is something that crossed my mind recently. Hadoop 2 is solidly > moving > > forward and, as someone who does not actively follow the hadoop > community, > > hadoop 1 is slowing down. Adoption for hadoop2 is on the rise and with > that > > I'm starting to wonder whether it's worth the code complexity to support > > both versions, particularly attempting to harness new features. > > > > What is the communities thought on this, maybe for 1.7 or maybe for > future > > releases? > > > -- Sean --047d7bf0cbb2689a0c04f63b531c--