accumulo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Corey Nolet <cjno...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: 551 JIRA Tickets Over 2 Years Old
Date Sat, 19 Apr 2014 14:11:18 GMT
Some of these tickets still look like very valid feature/integration
requests that would still be reasonable to have.

See ACCUMULO-74, ACCUMULO-143, ACCUMULO-136, ACCUMULO-211, ACCUMULO-483,
ACCUMULO-490, ACCUMULO-508




On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 9:54 AM, Mike Drob <mdrob@mdrob.com> wrote:

> Deleting tickets is a no-no, but flagging them is certainly fine.
> On Apr 19, 2014 12:03 AM, "David Medinets" <david.medinets@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Opps. Sorry, I did my filtering badly. There are 68 tickets over 2 years
> > old.
> >
> >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-18?jql=project%20%3D%20ACCUMULO%20AND%20status%20in%20%28Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened%2C%20%22Patch%20Available%22%29%20AND%20created%20%3C%3D%20-104w%20ORDER%20BY%20key%20ASC
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 12:01 AM, David Medinets
> > <david.medinets@gmail.com>wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-551?jql=project%20%3D%20ACCUMULO%20AND%20created%20%3C%3D%20-104w%20ORDER%20BY%20key%20DESC
> > >
> > > Is there a technique we can use to curate old tickets? Would anyone
> mind
> > > if I review them and nominate tickets for closure? I can add a message
> > and
> > > delete any tickets that don't provoke a response. How useful are
> tickets
> > > that are two years old?
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message