accumulo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Corey Nolet <cjno...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [PROPOSAL] Accumulo Blog
Date Thu, 10 Apr 2014 20:15:03 GMT
Chris, would you be in favor of forwarding blog posts to G+ so that it can
still be provided to that community?


On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Corey Nolet <cjnolet@gmail.com> wrote:

> I'm in favor of full reposts wherever possible. It may be duplication of
> content, but it validates for many that the content has been approved by
> the community. While the content is being republished, I'm still in favor
> of posting a link to the original blog post (if applicable).
>
> I find a blog useful when it's from a reputable source, it's easy to find,
> and what I need is right there. I, personally, wouldn't find it as useful
> if I searched a blog and then had to go somewhere else to find the actual
> content.
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Bill Havanki <bhavanki@clouderagovt.com>wrote:
>
>> I think that would be splendid, Don. :)
>>
>> I'd be happy to help out with getting this set up. I'm in favor of using
>> Apache's blog infrastructure, at least at first, since it's ready to go
>> and
>> explicitly for this purpose. I like the sense of place it provides, vs. a
>> loose topic on G+ / elsewhere.
>>
>> - I'm not a fan of just posting links to articles elsewhere. There should
>> be at least a short, complete passage for each post with a link to the
>> full
>> thing, if not a full repost.
>> - Lazy approval sounds fine to me, since a PMC member has to post the
>> content anyway.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Donald Miner <dminer@clearedgeit.com
>> >wrote:
>>
>> > Is this something i can volunteer to help manage if nobody else wants
>> to?
>> > Do things like set it up, collect blog posts from authors, edit them,
>> post
>> > them, manage the draft and vote process, etc.
>> >
>> > Just putting that out there as i see it as a way i can contribute to the
>> > community and i also personally think it is a good idea.
>> >
>> > -d
>> >
>> > > On Apr 10, 2014, at 1:59 PM, Mike Drob <madrob@cloudera.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Not sure how I feel about the Google+ community. As the PMC, aren't we
>> > > responsible for brand management?
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Christopher <ctubbsii@apache.org>
>> > wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> Personally, I'd find it easier to simply suggest people post to a
>> > >> common Google+ topic/community, when there's something of community
>> > >> interest to blog about, rather than maintain a monolithic blog.
>> > >>
>> > >> There may be others with the same topic/name, but this one is the one
>> > >> I saw first:
>> > >> https://plus.google.com/communities/117836301734017142321
>> > >>
>> > >> --
>> > >> Christopher L Tubbs II
>> > >> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 12:12 PM,  <dlmarion@comcast.net>
wrote:
>> > >>> I am proposing a blog for the project to be hosted on the
>> > >> blogs.apache.org site. There was a similar proposal last year on the
>> > dev
>> > >> list [1], but no vote or decision. Apache has a web page with setup
>> > >> instructions [2], which also states that the PMC is responsible for
>> the
>> > >> blog content and for granting write access to the blog. The process
>> for
>> > >> setting up a blog is easy and defined in [2].
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>> To move forward I think we need to resolve some items:
>> > >>>
>> > >>> 1. The bylaws don't define how to vote on blog content, but the
>> default
>> > >> vote is in a Lazy Approval fashion, with no defined timeframe. I'm
>> > thinking
>> > >> 3 days. Since the PMC is responsible for the content, should we
>> enforce
>> > >> something different, say, consensus or majority approval from active
>> PMC
>> > >> members over 3 days?
>> > >>>
>> > >>> 2. Guidelines for content. If we accept cross-posts from other
>> sites or
>> > >> blog posts from guest writers (non-contributors, non-committers),
>> what
>> > >> rules should be enforced (PMC is responsible for content)? For any
>> > author,
>> > >> can their employer or employer's products be mentioned?
>> > >>>
>> > >>> 3. Do the articles need to be Apache licensed?
>> > >>>
>> > >>> [1]
>> > >>
>> >
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/accumulo-dev/201311.mbox/%3CCAD-fFU%2B7ZqoVGYMzN%3D09dv9fMSv%2BF32XbsMubsw9HTZ6n155rg%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>> > >>> [2] http://www.apache.org/dev/project-blogs
>> > >>
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> // Bill Havanki
>> // Solutions Architect, Cloudera Govt Solutions
>> // 443.686.9283
>>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message