accumulo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From William Slacum <wilhelm.von.cl...@accumulo.net>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.6.0-RC4
Date Mon, 28 Apr 2014 15:30:27 GMT
I was concerned about the lack of activity. I don't have a personal need
for an extension, but I do recall a discussion about Friday RC's
potentially being problematic in the past, which is why I brought it up.


On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Christopher <ctubbsii@apache.org> wrote:

> I don't know what everyone's schedules are. If the point of a vote was
> to begin performing testing, I'd say yes, or if this were RC1, I'd say
> yes (or extended it to 4 days so it's not a surprise). However, since
> we're already in the RC mindset, having had 3 prior ones already, an
> RC4 was already expected to be forthcoming. Since I don't think any of
> the issues since RC3 invalidate the previous testing, and because this
> is RC4, having gone through several previous candidates, I think a 3
> day vote starting on Friday is fine. That gives many people an
> opportunity to examine the release candidate's changes since the last
> one, whether they do so on a weekend or whether they do so on Monday.
>
> I'm not concerned about the lack of initial activity... that's usually
> the pattern for votes.
>
> Do you think you need extra time to evaluate the release candidate? Do
> we need to discuss an extension?
>
> --
> Christopher L Tubbs II
> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 8:24 AM, William Slacum
> <wilhelm.von.cloud@accumulo.net> wrote:
> > Do you think doing this on a Friday was a good idea? I know that point
> came
> > up earlier, and it was possibly due to already discovered issues that
> would
> > fail the release, but I think the lack of traffic on here is significant.
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 8:37 PM, Christopher <ctubbsii@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Correction on the vote end date. It's:
> >> Tue, 2014 April 29 01:00 UTC ... or
> >> Mon, 2014 April 28 21:00 EDT (9pm)
> >>
> >> The initial email had the wrong date (28 instead of 29).
> >>
> >> --
> >> Christopher L Tubbs II
> >> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 8:35 PM, Christopher <ctubbsii@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >> > Accumulo Developers,
> >> >
> >> > Please consider the following candidate for Accumulo 1.6.0.
> >> >
> >> > Git Commit: 95ddea99e120102ce3316efbbe4948b574e59bc3
> >> > Branch: 1.6.0-RC4
> >> >
> >> > Staging repo:
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1010
> >> > Source:
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1010/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.0/accumulo-1.6.0-src.tar.gz
> >> > Binary:
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1010/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.0/accumulo-1.6.0-bin.tar.gz
> >> > (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash for a
> >> > given artifact.)
> >> >
> >> > All artifacts were built and staged with:
> >> > mvn release:prepare && mvn release:perform
> >> >
> >> > Signing keys available at: https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS
> >> >
> >> > Release notes (in progress):
> >> http://accumulo.apache.org/release_notes/1.6.0
> >> >
> >> > Changes since RC3 (`git log 5678e51..origin/1.6.0-RC4`):
> >> >
> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1219
> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2523
> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2569
> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2654
> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2707
> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2713
> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2714
> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2715
> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2716
> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2717
> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2718
> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2720
> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2723
> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2726
> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2728
> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2729
> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2733
> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2734
> >> >
> >> > This vote will remain open for 72 hours (3 days), until Tue, 2014
> >> > April 28 01:00 UTC.
> >> > (That's 9pm EDT on Monday.)
> >> >
> >> > [ ] +1 - I have verified and accept...
> >> > [ ] +0 - I have reservations, but not strong enough to vote against...
> >> > [ ] -1 - Because..., I do not accept...
> >> > ... these artifacts as the 1.6.0 release of Apache Accumulo.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks.
> >> >
> >> > P.S. Hint: download the whole staging repo with
> >> > wget -erobots=off -r -l inf -np -nH
> >> >
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1010/
> >> > # note the trailing slash is needed
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Christopher L Tubbs II
> >> > http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
> >>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message