accumulo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Christopher <ctubb...@apache.org>
Subject Re: 551 JIRA Tickets Over 2 Years Old
Date Sat, 19 Apr 2014 19:03:56 GMT
Resolving them as "Won't Fix" seems valid to me, if the fact that a
ticket is open helps us track/manage outstanding work. (The obvious
question, then, is "does it help in some way?"). They can always be
re-opened if we decide it's worth doing.

--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii


On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 1:05 PM, John Vines <vines@apache.org> wrote:
> Just because they're old doesn't make them invalid. They're just at a lower
> priority. Closing them for the sake of closing them seems like a bad idea.
>
> But if they're actually invalid now, that's an entirely different notion.
>
> Sent from my phone, please pardon the typos and brevity.
> On Apr 19, 2014 12:42 PM, "David Medinets" <david.medinets@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> ACCUMULO-483 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-483>, for
>> example, involves creating a purge locality utility. However, there have
>> been no comments since Oct 2012. If the feature has not risen in priority
>> since then, how will it become more important in the future. Perhaps a
>> 'good ideas' page or 'roadmap' page could be added to
>> http://accumulo.apache.org/? I don't see a benefit to keeping these old
>> tickets.
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 10:11 AM, Corey Nolet <cjnolet@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Some of these tickets still look like very valid feature/integration
>> > requests that would still be reasonable to have.
>> >
>> > See ACCUMULO-74, ACCUMULO-143, ACCUMULO-136, ACCUMULO-211, ACCUMULO-483,
>> > ACCUMULO-490, ACCUMULO-508
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 9:54 AM, Mike Drob <mdrob@mdrob.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Deleting tickets is a no-no, but flagging them is certainly fine.
>> > > On Apr 19, 2014 12:03 AM, "David Medinets" <david.medinets@gmail.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Opps. Sorry, I did my filtering badly. There are 68 tickets over 2
>> > years
>> > > > old.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-18?jql=project%20%3D%20ACCUMULO%20AND%20status%20in%20%28Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened%2C%20%22Patch%20Available%22%29%20AND%20created%20%3C%3D%20-104w%20ORDER%20BY%20key%20ASC
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 12:01 AM, David Medinets
>> > > > <david.medinets@gmail.com>wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-551?jql=project%20%3D%20ACCUMULO%20AND%20created%20%3C%3D%20-104w%20ORDER%20BY%20key%20DESC
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Is there a technique we can use to curate old tickets? Would
anyone
>> > > mind
>> > > > > if I review them and nominate tickets for closure? I can add
a
>> > message
>> > > > and
>> > > > > delete any tickets that don't provoke a response. How useful
are
>> > > tickets
>> > > > > that are two years old?
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>

Mime
View raw message