accumulo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Christopher <ctubb...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [PROPOSAL] Accumulo Blog
Date Thu, 10 Apr 2014 21:46:54 GMT
Seems reasonable. I just thought the organic, informal, open,
topic-subscription model, was a good one. No formal maintenance/effort
required.

--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii


On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 4:15 PM, Corey Nolet <cjnolet@gmail.com> wrote:
> Chris, would you be in favor of forwarding blog posts to G+ so that it can
> still be provided to that community?
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Corey Nolet <cjnolet@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I'm in favor of full reposts wherever possible. It may be duplication of
>> content, but it validates for many that the content has been approved by
>> the community. While the content is being republished, I'm still in favor
>> of posting a link to the original blog post (if applicable).
>>
>> I find a blog useful when it's from a reputable source, it's easy to find,
>> and what I need is right there. I, personally, wouldn't find it as useful
>> if I searched a blog and then had to go somewhere else to find the actual
>> content.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Bill Havanki <bhavanki@clouderagovt.com>wrote:
>>
>>> I think that would be splendid, Don. :)
>>>
>>> I'd be happy to help out with getting this set up. I'm in favor of using
>>> Apache's blog infrastructure, at least at first, since it's ready to go
>>> and
>>> explicitly for this purpose. I like the sense of place it provides, vs. a
>>> loose topic on G+ / elsewhere.
>>>
>>> - I'm not a fan of just posting links to articles elsewhere. There should
>>> be at least a short, complete passage for each post with a link to the
>>> full
>>> thing, if not a full repost.
>>> - Lazy approval sounds fine to me, since a PMC member has to post the
>>> content anyway.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Donald Miner <dminer@clearedgeit.com
>>> >wrote:
>>>
>>> > Is this something i can volunteer to help manage if nobody else wants
>>> to?
>>> > Do things like set it up, collect blog posts from authors, edit them,
>>> post
>>> > them, manage the draft and vote process, etc.
>>> >
>>> > Just putting that out there as i see it as a way i can contribute to the
>>> > community and i also personally think it is a good idea.
>>> >
>>> > -d
>>> >
>>> > > On Apr 10, 2014, at 1:59 PM, Mike Drob <madrob@cloudera.com>
wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > Not sure how I feel about the Google+ community. As the PMC, aren't
we
>>> > > responsible for brand management?
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Christopher <ctubbsii@apache.org>
>>> > wrote:
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Personally, I'd find it easier to simply suggest people post to
a
>>> > >> common Google+ topic/community, when there's something of community
>>> > >> interest to blog about, rather than maintain a monolithic blog.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> There may be others with the same topic/name, but this one is the
one
>>> > >> I saw first:
>>> > >> https://plus.google.com/communities/117836301734017142321
>>> > >>
>>> > >> --
>>> > >> Christopher L Tubbs II
>>> > >> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 12:12 PM,  <dlmarion@comcast.net>
wrote:
>>> > >>> I am proposing a blog for the project to be hosted on the
>>> > >> blogs.apache.org site. There was a similar proposal last year on
the
>>> > dev
>>> > >> list [1], but no vote or decision. Apache has a web page with setup
>>> > >> instructions [2], which also states that the PMC is responsible
for
>>> the
>>> > >> blog content and for granting write access to the blog. The process
>>> for
>>> > >> setting up a blog is easy and defined in [2].
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> To move forward I think we need to resolve some items:
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> 1. The bylaws don't define how to vote on blog content, but
the
>>> default
>>> > >> vote is in a Lazy Approval fashion, with no defined timeframe.
I'm
>>> > thinking
>>> > >> 3 days. Since the PMC is responsible for the content, should we
>>> enforce
>>> > >> something different, say, consensus or majority approval from active
>>> PMC
>>> > >> members over 3 days?
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> 2. Guidelines for content. If we accept cross-posts from other
>>> sites or
>>> > >> blog posts from guest writers (non-contributors, non-committers),
>>> what
>>> > >> rules should be enforced (PMC is responsible for content)? For
any
>>> > author,
>>> > >> can their employer or employer's products be mentioned?
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> 3. Do the articles need to be Apache licensed?
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> [1]
>>> > >>
>>> >
>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/accumulo-dev/201311.mbox/%3CCAD-fFU%2B7ZqoVGYMzN%3D09dv9fMSv%2BF32XbsMubsw9HTZ6n155rg%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>>> > >>> [2] http://www.apache.org/dev/project-blogs
>>> > >>
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> // Bill Havanki
>>> // Solutions Architect, Cloudera Govt Solutions
>>> // 443.686.9283
>>>
>>
>>

Mime
View raw message