accumulo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mike Drob <>
Subject Re: Does Accumulo Have a Physical Table Limitation Like HBase?
Date Tue, 29 Apr 2014 19:26:59 GMT
I think the limitation in Accumulo is on Tablets, not Tables (module
cluster size, of course).

I've never seen anything that would indicate number of tables on a system
to be an issue.

On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 3:21 PM, David Medinets <>wrote:

> I have never used HBase and I've only used Accumulo with less than 100
> tables. However, when I see a statement like the following about HBase,  I
> feel compelled to ask how it compares to Accumulo. Does anyone know?
>     This is especially important in HBase, as you cannot
>     realistically expect to have more than perhaps up
>     to a hundred physical tables and continue to get
>     reasonable performance from HBase.

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message