accumulo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Eric Newton <eric.new...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.6.0-RC1
Date Tue, 15 Apr 2014 18:22:38 GMT
-1

Testing is going pretty well. I'm looking forward to RC2. :-)


On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Christopher <ctubbsii@apache.org> wrote:

> -1
>
> Though I started the vote, I'm also going to -1 for the performance
> issue, since we have a ready fix.
>
> --
> Christopher L Tubbs II
> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 1:14 AM, Josh Elser <josh.elser@gmail.com> wrote:
> > -1 due to the large performance regression (~40% degradation) identified
> by
> > Jonathan Park in ACCUMULO-2668
> >
> > Additionally, it would be nice to get ACCUMULO-2665 to ensure that we can
> > unit test against Apache Hadoop 2.4.0 for 1.6.0, but I am not -1 on that
> > issue alone (just -0 if it comes to that).
> >
> > Aside from those two, the rest of the release looks pretty good to me:
> >
> > * Used 86a9a8a1 to run unit and integration tests against Apache Hadoop
> > 2.2.0, 2.3.0, and 2.4.0 (with ACCUMULO-2665 caveat for 2.4.0)
> > * Verified sigs and hashes for tarballs (didn't write a script to verify
> all
> > sigs from the staging repo -- I trust nexus here)
> > * Ran short CI+verification on Apache Hadoop 2.3.0
> > * Ran short CI on Apache Hadoop 2.4.0 (ran into an issue with launching
> the
> > verification job -- maybe it's just me doing something dumb?)
> > * Verified basic compatibility with Apache Pig 0.13.0-SNAPSHOT (caveat
> > PIG-3885). Read/Write data, join two tables.
> > * Downloaded source tarball, built jars and nativemaps, ran unit and
> > integration tests, and tested basic read/write test on Apache Hadoop
> 2.3.0
> > * Downloaded binary tarball, built nativemaps, tested basic read/write on
> > Apache Hadoop 2.3.0
> >
> > One final (repeated) comment, the binary tarball lack of a prebuilt
> native
> > map. I believe this merits mention in the release notes before those are
> > finalized. I will update this.
> >
> >
> > On 4/11/14, 6:41 PM, Christopher wrote:
> >>
> >> Accumulo Developers,
> >>
> >> Please consider the following candidate for Accumulo 1.6.0.
> >>
> >> Git Commit: 86a9a8a1d4f5215039ad2cfe86b0b7397455838a
> >> Branch: 1.6.0-RC1
> >>
> >> Staging repo:
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1007
> >> Source:
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1007/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.0/accumulo-1.6.0-src.tar.gz
> >> Binary:
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1007/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.0/accumulo-1.6.0-bin.tar.gz
> >> (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash for a
> >> given artifact.)
> >>
> >> All artifacts were built and staged with:
> >> mvn release:prepare && mvn release:perform
> >>
> >> Signing keys available at: https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS
> >>
> >> Release notes (in progress):
> >> http://accumulo.apache.org/release_notes/1.6.0
> >>
> >> This vote will remain open for 96 hours (4 days, due to the weekend,
> >> and because I know some people want to finish some long tests), until
> >> Tue, April 15, 23:00 UTC 2014. (That's 7pm EDT.)
> >>
> >> [ ] +1 - I have verified and accept...
> >> [ ] +0 - I have reservations, but not strong enough to vote against...
> >> [ ] -1 - Because..., I do not accept...
> >> ... these artifacts as the 1.6.0 release of Apache Accumulo.
> >>
> >> Thanks.
> >>
> >> P.S. Hint: download the whole staging repo with
> >> wget -erobots=off -r -l inf -np -nH
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1007/
> >> # note the trailing slash is needed
> >>
> >> --
> >> Christopher L Tubbs II
> >> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
> >>
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message