accumulo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Eric Newton <eric.new...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Release testing for 1.6.0
Date Tue, 15 Apr 2014 15:18:58 GMT
I'm running LongClean RW without aggitation.


On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 10:05 AM, Mike Drob <madrob@cloudera.com> wrote:

> Eric -
>
> Are you running with or without agitation?
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 9:41 AM, Eric Newton <eric.newton@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I'm running RW with ShortClean, and I have reported a number of issues
> > (ACCUMULO-2655).  They may be issues with my test environment, or the
> > mechanism used to tear down the tests after they timeout.  I'm still
> > investigating.
> >
> > -Eric
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 9:06 AM, Keith Turner <keith@deenlo.com> wrote:
> > > I'm running a 24hr CI run w/o agitation on hour 14.  This run has
> patches
> > > from ACCUMULO-2668, ACCUMULO-2667, and ACCUMULO-2670.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 7:10 PM, Sean Busbey <busbey@cloudera.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Can we circle back on where we are wrt required testing on 1.6.0? As
> is,
> > >> there's < 24hr remaining on the RC1 vote.
> > >>
> > >> I think we have outstanding:
> > >>
> > >> 1) Continuous Ingest run 24 hrs w/o agitation, verified
> > >>
> > >> 2) RandomWalk with LongClean for 24hrs
> > >>
> > >> 3) RandomWalk with LongClean and agitation for 24hrs
> > >>
> > >> I believe Mike D. finished the 72hr CI w/o agitation and Bill H. has a
> > #2
> > >> in progress.
> > >>
> > >> I had #1 queued for this previous weekend on BigTop 0.7.0, but my
> > cluster
> > >> had NIC issues under stress and blew up. It did get to do some
> ingestion
> > >> and it did make attempts for hte full 24hr. so if it gets fixed in
> time
> > I
> > >> still could go through recovery and verification.
> > >>
> > >> Does anyone else have tests in progress that will fulfill #1 and #3?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 1:40 PM, Bill Havanki <
> > bhavanki@clouderagovt.com
> > >> >wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > I have been working randomwalk. I got through my issue with the
> > >> Concurrent
> > >> > rw test [1]. I am now seeing a problem with Shard [2] which I'm
> > rerunning
> > >> > to get more information.
> > >> >
> > >> > I haven't seen the particular issues Eric encountered [3].
> > >> >
> > >> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2621
> > >> > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2657
> > >> > [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2655
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Josh Elser <josh.elser@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > I had a successful run of all UTs and ITs on Tuesday (against
> > 479a36bd)
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On 4/3/14, 1:58 PM, Sean Busbey wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > >> Cloudera has finished successfully verifying a 24 hour Continuous
> > >> Ingest
> > >> > >> Test with agitation on an HA configured cluster with 7 nodes
and
> 5
> > >> > workers
> > >> > >> against 1.6.0 as of commit 3a1b38.
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> We'd like to coordinate with anyone else who's working through
> the
> > >> > release
> > >> > >> criteria.
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >>
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > --
> > >> > // Bill Havanki
> > >> > // Solutions Architect, Cloudera Govt Solutions
> > >> > // 443.686.9283
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Sean
> > >>
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message