accumulo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From John Vines <vi...@apache.org>
Subject Re: 551 JIRA Tickets Over 2 Years Old
Date Sat, 19 Apr 2014 17:05:50 GMT
Just because they're old doesn't make them invalid. They're just at a lower
priority. Closing them for the sake of closing them seems like a bad idea.

But if they're actually invalid now, that's an entirely different notion.

Sent from my phone, please pardon the typos and brevity.
On Apr 19, 2014 12:42 PM, "David Medinets" <david.medinets@gmail.com> wrote:

> ACCUMULO-483 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-483>, for
> example, involves creating a purge locality utility. However, there have
> been no comments since Oct 2012. If the feature has not risen in priority
> since then, how will it become more important in the future. Perhaps a
> 'good ideas' page or 'roadmap' page could be added to
> http://accumulo.apache.org/? I don't see a benefit to keeping these old
> tickets.
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 10:11 AM, Corey Nolet <cjnolet@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Some of these tickets still look like very valid feature/integration
> > requests that would still be reasonable to have.
> >
> > See ACCUMULO-74, ACCUMULO-143, ACCUMULO-136, ACCUMULO-211, ACCUMULO-483,
> > ACCUMULO-490, ACCUMULO-508
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 9:54 AM, Mike Drob <mdrob@mdrob.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Deleting tickets is a no-no, but flagging them is certainly fine.
> > > On Apr 19, 2014 12:03 AM, "David Medinets" <david.medinets@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Opps. Sorry, I did my filtering badly. There are 68 tickets over 2
> > years
> > > > old.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-18?jql=project%20%3D%20ACCUMULO%20AND%20status%20in%20%28Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened%2C%20%22Patch%20Available%22%29%20AND%20created%20%3C%3D%20-104w%20ORDER%20BY%20key%20ASC
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 12:01 AM, David Medinets
> > > > <david.medinets@gmail.com>wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-551?jql=project%20%3D%20ACCUMULO%20AND%20created%20%3C%3D%20-104w%20ORDER%20BY%20key%20DESC
> > > > >
> > > > > Is there a technique we can use to curate old tickets? Would anyone
> > > mind
> > > > > if I review them and nominate tickets for closure? I can add a
> > message
> > > > and
> > > > > delete any tickets that don't provoke a response. How useful are
> > > tickets
> > > > > that are two years old?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message