accumulo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From John Vines <vi...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.6.0-RC4
Date Mon, 28 Apr 2014 16:03:24 GMT
Please change the subject if you're going to change this into a
conversation about when to start votes. This subject is for votes for an RC
candidate.


On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 11:30 AM, William Slacum <
wilhelm.von.cloud@accumulo.net> wrote:

> I was concerned about the lack of activity. I don't have a personal need
> for an extension, but I do recall a discussion about Friday RC's
> potentially being problematic in the past, which is why I brought it up.
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Christopher <ctubbsii@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > I don't know what everyone's schedules are. If the point of a vote was
> > to begin performing testing, I'd say yes, or if this were RC1, I'd say
> > yes (or extended it to 4 days so it's not a surprise). However, since
> > we're already in the RC mindset, having had 3 prior ones already, an
> > RC4 was already expected to be forthcoming. Since I don't think any of
> > the issues since RC3 invalidate the previous testing, and because this
> > is RC4, having gone through several previous candidates, I think a 3
> > day vote starting on Friday is fine. That gives many people an
> > opportunity to examine the release candidate's changes since the last
> > one, whether they do so on a weekend or whether they do so on Monday.
> >
> > I'm not concerned about the lack of initial activity... that's usually
> > the pattern for votes.
> >
> > Do you think you need extra time to evaluate the release candidate? Do
> > we need to discuss an extension?
> >
> > --
> > Christopher L Tubbs II
> > http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 8:24 AM, William Slacum
> > <wilhelm.von.cloud@accumulo.net> wrote:
> > > Do you think doing this on a Friday was a good idea? I know that point
> > came
> > > up earlier, and it was possibly due to already discovered issues that
> > would
> > > fail the release, but I think the lack of traffic on here is
> significant.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 8:37 PM, Christopher <ctubbsii@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Correction on the vote end date. It's:
> > >> Tue, 2014 April 29 01:00 UTC ... or
> > >> Mon, 2014 April 28 21:00 EDT (9pm)
> > >>
> > >> The initial email had the wrong date (28 instead of 29).
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Christopher L Tubbs II
> > >> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 8:35 PM, Christopher <ctubbsii@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >> > Accumulo Developers,
> > >> >
> > >> > Please consider the following candidate for Accumulo 1.6.0.
> > >> >
> > >> > Git Commit: 95ddea99e120102ce3316efbbe4948b574e59bc3
> > >> > Branch: 1.6.0-RC4
> > >> >
> > >> > Staging repo:
> > >>
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1010
> > >> > Source:
> > >>
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1010/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.0/accumulo-1.6.0-src.tar.gz
> > >> > Binary:
> > >>
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1010/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.0/accumulo-1.6.0-bin.tar.gz
> > >> > (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash
> for a
> > >> > given artifact.)
> > >> >
> > >> > All artifacts were built and staged with:
> > >> > mvn release:prepare && mvn release:perform
> > >> >
> > >> > Signing keys available at:
> https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS
> > >> >
> > >> > Release notes (in progress):
> > >> http://accumulo.apache.org/release_notes/1.6.0
> > >> >
> > >> > Changes since RC3 (`git log 5678e51..origin/1.6.0-RC4`):
> > >> >
> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1219
> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2523
> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2569
> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2654
> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2707
> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2713
> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2714
> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2715
> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2716
> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2717
> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2718
> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2720
> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2723
> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2726
> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2728
> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2729
> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2733
> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2734
> > >> >
> > >> > This vote will remain open for 72 hours (3 days), until Tue, 2014
> > >> > April 28 01:00 UTC.
> > >> > (That's 9pm EDT on Monday.)
> > >> >
> > >> > [ ] +1 - I have verified and accept...
> > >> > [ ] +0 - I have reservations, but not strong enough to vote
> against...
> > >> > [ ] -1 - Because..., I do not accept...
> > >> > ... these artifacts as the 1.6.0 release of Apache Accumulo.
> > >> >
> > >> > Thanks.
> > >> >
> > >> > P.S. Hint: download the whole staging repo with
> > >> > wget -erobots=off -r -l inf -np -nH
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1010/
> > >> > # note the trailing slash is needed
> > >> >
> > >> > --
> > >> > Christopher L Tubbs II
> > >> > http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
> > >>
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message