accumulo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Bill Havanki <bhava...@clouderagovt.com>
Subject Re: Release testing for 1.6.0
Date Tue, 15 Apr 2014 21:40:21 GMT
I just started LongClean rw with agitation. (I only use one walker, unlike
Eric who apparently uses many.)


On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Eric Newton <eric.newton@gmail.com> wrote:

> I'm running LongClean RW without aggitation.
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 10:05 AM, Mike Drob <madrob@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
> > Eric -
> >
> > Are you running with or without agitation?
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 9:41 AM, Eric Newton <eric.newton@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I'm running RW with ShortClean, and I have reported a number of issues
> > > (ACCUMULO-2655).  They may be issues with my test environment, or the
> > > mechanism used to tear down the tests after they timeout.  I'm still
> > > investigating.
> > >
> > > -Eric
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 9:06 AM, Keith Turner <keith@deenlo.com>
> wrote:
> > > > I'm running a 24hr CI run w/o agitation on hour 14.  This run has
> > patches
> > > > from ACCUMULO-2668, ACCUMULO-2667, and ACCUMULO-2670.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 7:10 PM, Sean Busbey <busbey@cloudera.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Can we circle back on where we are wrt required testing on 1.6.0?
As
> > is,
> > > >> there's < 24hr remaining on the RC1 vote.
> > > >>
> > > >> I think we have outstanding:
> > > >>
> > > >> 1) Continuous Ingest run 24 hrs w/o agitation, verified
> > > >>
> > > >> 2) RandomWalk with LongClean for 24hrs
> > > >>
> > > >> 3) RandomWalk with LongClean and agitation for 24hrs
> > > >>
> > > >> I believe Mike D. finished the 72hr CI w/o agitation and Bill H.
> has a
> > > #2
> > > >> in progress.
> > > >>
> > > >> I had #1 queued for this previous weekend on BigTop 0.7.0, but my
> > > cluster
> > > >> had NIC issues under stress and blew up. It did get to do some
> > ingestion
> > > >> and it did make attempts for hte full 24hr. so if it gets fixed in
> > time
> > > I
> > > >> still could go through recovery and verification.
> > > >>
> > > >> Does anyone else have tests in progress that will fulfill #1 and #3?
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 1:40 PM, Bill Havanki <
> > > bhavanki@clouderagovt.com
> > > >> >wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > I have been working randomwalk. I got through my issue with the
> > > >> Concurrent
> > > >> > rw test [1]. I am now seeing a problem with Shard [2] which I'm
> > > rerunning
> > > >> > to get more information.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > I haven't seen the particular issues Eric encountered [3].
> > > >> >
> > > >> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2621
> > > >> > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2657
> > > >> > [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2655
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Josh Elser <josh.elser@gmail.com
> >
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > I had a successful run of all UTs and ITs on Tuesday (against
> > > 479a36bd)
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > On 4/3/14, 1:58 PM, Sean Busbey wrote:
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >> Cloudera has finished successfully verifying a 24 hour
> Continuous
> > > >> Ingest
> > > >> > >> Test with agitation on an HA configured cluster with
7 nodes
> and
> > 5
> > > >> > workers
> > > >> > >> against 1.6.0 as of commit 3a1b38.
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >> We'd like to coordinate with anyone else who's working
through
> > the
> > > >> > release
> > > >> > >> criteria.
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > --
> > > >> > // Bill Havanki
> > > >> > // Solutions Architect, Cloudera Govt Solutions
> > > >> > // 443.686.9283
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >> Sean
> > > >>
> > >
> >
>



-- 
// Bill Havanki
// Solutions Architect, Cloudera Govt Solutions
// 443.686.9283

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message