accumulo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Bill Havanki <bhava...@clouderagovt.com>
Subject Re: Release testing for 1.6.0
Date Tue, 15 Apr 2014 14:40:38 GMT
My run of LongClean randomwalk just passed the 24-hour mark.

commit 63ca9c9 with patches for ACCUMULO-2621
7-node cluster on CDH 4.5 (Hadoop 2.0.0+CDH4.5.0), 2 masters, 5 tservers, 3
ZKs
CentOS 6.4 64-bit

I'll start to update and re-tool for an agitation run.


On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 9:41 AM, Eric Newton <eric.newton@gmail.com> wrote:

> I'm running RW with ShortClean, and I have reported a number of issues
> (ACCUMULO-2655).  They may be issues with my test environment, or the
> mechanism used to tear down the tests after they timeout.  I'm still
> investigating.
>
> -Eric
>
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 9:06 AM, Keith Turner <keith@deenlo.com> wrote:
> > I'm running a 24hr CI run w/o agitation on hour 14.  This run has patches
> > from ACCUMULO-2668, ACCUMULO-2667, and ACCUMULO-2670.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 7:10 PM, Sean Busbey <busbey@cloudera.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Can we circle back on where we are wrt required testing on 1.6.0? As is,
> >> there's < 24hr remaining on the RC1 vote.
> >>
> >> I think we have outstanding:
> >>
> >> 1) Continuous Ingest run 24 hrs w/o agitation, verified
> >>
> >> 2) RandomWalk with LongClean for 24hrs
> >>
> >> 3) RandomWalk with LongClean and agitation for 24hrs
> >>
> >> I believe Mike D. finished the 72hr CI w/o agitation and Bill H. has a
> #2
> >> in progress.
> >>
> >> I had #1 queued for this previous weekend on BigTop 0.7.0, but my
> cluster
> >> had NIC issues under stress and blew up. It did get to do some ingestion
> >> and it did make attempts for hte full 24hr. so if it gets fixed in time
> I
> >> still could go through recovery and verification.
> >>
> >> Does anyone else have tests in progress that will fulfill #1 and #3?
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 1:40 PM, Bill Havanki <
> bhavanki@clouderagovt.com
> >> >wrote:
> >>
> >> > I have been working randomwalk. I got through my issue with the
> >> Concurrent
> >> > rw test [1]. I am now seeing a problem with Shard [2] which I'm
> rerunning
> >> > to get more information.
> >> >
> >> > I haven't seen the particular issues Eric encountered [3].
> >> >
> >> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2621
> >> > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2657
> >> > [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2655
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Josh Elser <josh.elser@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > I had a successful run of all UTs and ITs on Tuesday (against
> 479a36bd)
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > On 4/3/14, 1:58 PM, Sean Busbey wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > >> Cloudera has finished successfully verifying a 24 hour Continuous
> >> Ingest
> >> > >> Test with agitation on an HA configured cluster with 7 nodes and
5
> >> > workers
> >> > >> against 1.6.0 as of commit 3a1b38.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> We'd like to coordinate with anyone else who's working through
the
> >> > release
> >> > >> criteria.
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > // Bill Havanki
> >> > // Solutions Architect, Cloudera Govt Solutions
> >> > // 443.686.9283
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Sean
> >>
>



-- 
// Bill Havanki
// Solutions Architect, Cloudera Govt Solutions
// 443.686.9283

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message