Mailing-List: contact dev-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@accumulo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of busbey@cloudera.com designates
 209.85.216.171 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <5332FC76.3000604@gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAGHyZ6LCofhLaChRgifEJ9XxajVQLxbgnrOTvSmZf_-WqvcPNQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGUtCHpyMQBguxfVJ2_So4qtao5wGQ8YX23RL3U4fMVWKsty2g@mail.gmail.com>
 <5332FC76.3000604@gmail.com>
From: Sean Busbey <busbey@cloudera.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 11:18:10 -0500
Message-ID: 
 <CAGHyZ6Jn8NZe6EBVPfTi62QhGWScxdwnY2Hv=rNm0FUZcgxDKA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] MiniAccumuloCluster goals and approach
To: "dev@accumulo apache. org" <dev@accumulo.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e013cba98d0b74804f584d182

--089e013cba98d0b74804f584d182
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Josh Elser <josh.elser@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 3/26/14, 9:06 AM, Keith Turner wrote:
>
>> There were many change made to MAC so Accumulo could test itself.  For
>> example a method was added to return the internal threads that flush logs.
>> Flushing the logs may be a useful feature to add.  However it could be
>> offered in a way that does not expose these internal threads.   When
>> working on  ACCUMULO-2151 I had no desire to reimplement things like this,
>> I just wanted to hide it.  It was hidden from users so we do not have to
>> support it and can change it at will when testing 1.7.0.
>>
>
> That's my irk with it. The changes we made "hide" things for no other
> purpose than saying "we hid them". The next variant of a MAC is going to
> have to re-architect the entire thing anyways (I'm doing this right now and
> I'm overhauling it).
>
>
>
We also haven't labeled anything @deprecated, so this same interface would
have to be supported in 1.7.x to meet our API promises.

--089e013cba98d0b74804f584d182--