accumulo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Medinets <david.medin...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Benchmarking Accumulo
Date Sun, 09 Mar 2014 19:55:31 GMT
What is the goal of your benchmarking? To some extent, benchmarking
Accumulo can't provide any true answers because it won't be using your
real-world data. A lot depends on the schema that you use. The D4M
benchmark would only be applicable to you if you plan to use their schema.


On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 2:23 PM, Kepner, Jeremy - 0553 - MITLL <
kepner@ll.mit.edu> wrote:

>
> On Mar 9, 2014, at 2:21 PM, Arshak Navruzyan <arshakn@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The benchmark in the D4M paper is very helpful but perhaps you could
> clarify a few things:
>
> 1.  The 4 million entries per second pertains to the main table only or
> the main table, transpose and degree tables as well?
>
>
> All tables.
>
> 2.  Can  you share you accumulo-site.xml settings for the test?  In
> particular the memory map size and compaction ratio settings.
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Jeremy Kepner <kepner@ll.mit.edu> wrote:
>
>> There is one in D4M :-)
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 04:48:32PM -0500, Morris, Jason wrote:
>> > Hey everyone,
>> >
>> > I was wondering if anyone had a benchmark test for Accumulo? I could
>> write a map/reduce job that creates a bunch of tables, maybe push some
>> data, then drop them but I was wondering if anyone had something better?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Jason
>>
>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message