accumulo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From William Slacum <wilhelm.von.cl...@accumulo.net>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] clarification of release guide
Date Fri, 21 Mar 2014 19:23:28 GMT
I agree with Chief Keith. Clarity in the docs would be good.


On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Keith Turner <keith@deenlo.com> wrote:

> I think the intention is 1 24h w/ agitation AND 1 24h w/o agitation
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Sean Busbey <busbey+lists@cloudera.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > Our release guide[1] has some lines that I'd like to clarify.
> >
> >
> >    1. Two 24-hour periods of the randomwalk LongClean test with and
> without
> >    agitation need to be run successfully.
> >    2. Two 24-hour periods of continuous ingest with and without agitation
> >    need to be validated successfully.
> >    3. Two 72-hour periods of continuous ingest with and without
> agitation.
> >    No validation is necessary but the cluster should be checked to ensure
> > it
> >    is still functional.
> >
> > Is the intention on each of these lines to have 4 total test periods?
> >
> > That is does number 1, for example, mean I need
> >
> > Period 1: 24 hr LongClean with agitation
> > Period 2: 24 hr LongClean with agitation
> > Period 3: 24 hr LongClean without agitation
> > Period 4: 24 hr LongClean without agitation
> >
> > Or is the intention for number 1 to mean:
> >
> > Period 1: 24 hr LongClean with agitation
> > Period 2: 24 hr LongClean without agitation
> >
> > Presuming we quickly have consensus, does anyone feel I'd need a [VOTE]
> > thread to rewrite the section to match, or would the [DISCUSS] thread be
> > sufficient?
> >
> >
> > -Sean
> >
> > [1]: http://accumulo.apache.org/governance/releasing.html#cluster-based
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message