accumulo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mike Drob <md...@mdrob.com>
Subject Re: Git Push Summary
Date Tue, 04 Mar 2014 12:44:11 GMT
The hash points indirectly at the commit because it carries signature
information.
On Mar 4, 2014 12:00 AM, "Christopher" <ctubbsii@apache.org> wrote:

> Yeah, I guess I was just confused, because I expected the hash
> provided in the message to point to the HEAD commit in the tag, not
> something specific to the tag's own blob.
>
> --
> Christopher L Tubbs II
> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 8:04 PM, John Vines <vines@apache.org> wrote:
> > Deleting the rc tag?
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 7:34 PM, Christopher <ctubbsii@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Nevermind and disregard. I'm mistaken. We voted on 3478f71a as
> >> 1.5.1-rc3... this tag is correct.
> >>
> >> However, I am confused about the previous push delete:
> >> "Updated Tags:  refs/tags/1.5.1-rc3 [deleted] c485b41f7"
> >>
> >> --
> >> Christopher L Tubbs II
> >> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 7:27 PM, Christopher <ctubbsii@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >> > This does not look correct. The 1.5.1 tag should have been the GPG
> >> > signed one that Josh was going to create from the 1.5.1-rc3
> >> > (c485b41f7). This is a different SHA1 entirely.
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Christopher L Tubbs II
> >> > http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 2:42 PM,  <vines@apache.org> wrote:
> >> >> Repository: accumulo
> >> >> Updated Tags:  refs/tags/1.5.1 [created] 6ce236826
> >>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message