accumulo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mike Drob <mad...@cloudera.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] clarification of release guide
Date Sun, 23 Mar 2014 16:01:56 GMT
We have gone with option #2 in the past.


On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 2:40 PM, Josh Elser <josh.elser@gmail.com> wrote:

> (repeating from IRC) this was also my interpretation.
>
>
> On 3/21/14, 1:03 PM, Keith Turner wrote:
>
>> I think the intention is 1 24h w/ agitation AND 1 24h w/o agitation
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Sean Busbey <busbey+lists@cloudera.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>  Hi!
>>>
>>> Our release guide[1] has some lines that I'd like to clarify.
>>>
>>>
>>>     1. Two 24-hour periods of the randomwalk LongClean test with and
>>> without
>>>     agitation need to be run successfully.
>>>     2. Two 24-hour periods of continuous ingest with and without
>>> agitation
>>>     need to be validated successfully.
>>>     3. Two 72-hour periods of continuous ingest with and without
>>> agitation.
>>>     No validation is necessary but the cluster should be checked to
>>> ensure
>>> it
>>>     is still functional.
>>>
>>> Is the intention on each of these lines to have 4 total test periods?
>>>
>>> That is does number 1, for example, mean I need
>>>
>>> Period 1: 24 hr LongClean with agitation
>>> Period 2: 24 hr LongClean with agitation
>>> Period 3: 24 hr LongClean without agitation
>>> Period 4: 24 hr LongClean without agitation
>>>
>>> Or is the intention for number 1 to mean:
>>>
>>> Period 1: 24 hr LongClean with agitation
>>> Period 2: 24 hr LongClean without agitation
>>>
>>> Presuming we quickly have consensus, does anyone feel I'd need a [VOTE]
>>> thread to rewrite the section to match, or would the [DISCUSS] thread be
>>> sufficient?
>>>
>>>
>>> -Sean
>>>
>>> [1]: http://accumulo.apache.org/governance/releasing.html#cluster-based
>>>
>>>
>>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message