accumulo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mike Drob <mad...@cloudera.com>
Subject Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Accumulo 1.4.5 RC-1
Date Thu, 27 Mar 2014 20:26:32 GMT
This vote fails with with 2 -1 votes and no others.


On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Christopher <ctubbsii@apache.org> wrote:

> One thing we could do is wait until somebody requests a release of a
> 1.4.5 compatible Wikisearch to bother. I'm not a fan of this option,
> because of the change in user expectations we've previously discussed.
> However, I haven't been putting any time or thought into 1.4.x to have
> any better ideas.
>
> The CHANGES file should, at the very least, reflect the change in the
> packaging to drop the wikisearch example, whether or not it is
> provided separately.
>
> --
> Christopher L Tubbs II
> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 10:16 AM, William Slacum
> <wilhelm.von.cloud@accumulo.net> wrote:
> > I was under the impression that a functioning Wikisearch was a
> requirement
> > for 1.4.5, as it would be consistent with all previous 1.4.x releases.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 11:35 PM, Josh Elser <josh.elser@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Thanks, Sean.
> >>
> >>
> >> On 3/26/14, 8:24 PM, Sean Busbey wrote:
> >>
> >>> Filed ACCUMULO-2564 as BLOCKER against the 1.4.5 release[1].
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2564
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 10:06 PM, Josh Elser <josh.elser@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>  I haven't seen any issues in 1.5 with Hadoop 1 and 2 compatibility, so
> >>>> I'm
> >>>> not sure where your feelings of risk are coming from.
> >>>>
> >>>> Also, I've already said that this is very important to me. I do not
> view
> >>>> this as a marginal benefit. I view this as half-porting Hadoop2
> support
> >>>> to
> >>>> 1.4.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 3/26/14, 6:53 PM, Sean Busbey wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>  The reflection stuff to obviate having an special build went into 1.5
> >>>>> in a
> >>>>> hurry between RCs. Frankly, I think including it would introduce
> >>>>> unnecessary risk to the stability of the 1.4 line for marginal
> benefit.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message