accumulo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Josh Elser <josh.el...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] clarification of release guide
Date Mon, 24 Mar 2014 20:38:29 GMT
LGTM

For the RandomWalk portion, perhaps using something like "the LongClean 
module of the RandomWalk test" to match the test's terminology would be 
clearer (I know I had to ask someone the first time to be sure)

On 3/24/14, 1:30 PM, Sean Busbey wrote:
> It looks like consensus is that the intent was for each of the test bullets
> to mean a total of 2 test cycles.
>
> Unless someone objects, I'm going to push clearer language this evening.
> Essentially, something like
>
> Two 24-hour periods of the randomwalk LongClean test need to be run
> successfully. One of them must use agitation and the other should not.
> Two 24-hour periods of continuous ingest must be validated successfully.
> One test period must use agitation and the other should not.
> Two 72-hour periods of continuous ingest must run. One test period must use
> agitation and the other should not. No validation is necessary but the
> cluster should be checked to ensure it is still functional.
>
>
>
>
> -Sean
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Mike Drob <madrob@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
>> We have gone with option #2 in the past.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 2:40 PM, Josh Elser <josh.elser@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> (repeating from IRC) this was also my interpretation.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 3/21/14, 1:03 PM, Keith Turner wrote:
>>>
>>>> I think the intention is 1 24h w/ agitation AND 1 24h w/o agitation
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Sean Busbey <
>> busbey+lists@cloudera.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>   Hi!
>>>>>
>>>>> Our release guide[1] has some lines that I'd like to clarify.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>      1. Two 24-hour periods of the randomwalk LongClean test with and
>>>>> without
>>>>>      agitation need to be run successfully.
>>>>>      2. Two 24-hour periods of continuous ingest with and without
>>>>> agitation
>>>>>      need to be validated successfully.
>>>>>      3. Two 72-hour periods of continuous ingest with and without
>>>>> agitation.
>>>>>      No validation is necessary but the cluster should be checked to
>>>>> ensure
>>>>> it
>>>>>      is still functional.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is the intention on each of these lines to have 4 total test periods?
>>>>>
>>>>> That is does number 1, for example, mean I need
>>>>>
>>>>> Period 1: 24 hr LongClean with agitation
>>>>> Period 2: 24 hr LongClean with agitation
>>>>> Period 3: 24 hr LongClean without agitation
>>>>> Period 4: 24 hr LongClean without agitation
>>>>>
>>>>> Or is the intention for number 1 to mean:
>>>>>
>>>>> Period 1: 24 hr LongClean with agitation
>>>>> Period 2: 24 hr LongClean without agitation
>>>>>
>>>>> Presuming we quickly have consensus, does anyone feel I'd need a [VOTE]
>>>>> thread to rewrite the section to match, or would the [DISCUSS] thread
>> be
>>>>> sufficient?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -Sean
>>>>>
>>>>> [1]:
>> http://accumulo.apache.org/governance/releasing.html#cluster-based
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>

Mime
View raw message