accumulo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Josh Elser <josh.el...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] clarification of release guide
Date Fri, 21 Mar 2014 19:40:57 GMT
(repeating from IRC) this was also my interpretation.

On 3/21/14, 1:03 PM, Keith Turner wrote:
> I think the intention is 1 24h w/ agitation AND 1 24h w/o agitation
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Sean Busbey <busbey+lists@cloudera.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> Our release guide[1] has some lines that I'd like to clarify.
>>
>>
>>     1. Two 24-hour periods of the randomwalk LongClean test with and without
>>     agitation need to be run successfully.
>>     2. Two 24-hour periods of continuous ingest with and without agitation
>>     need to be validated successfully.
>>     3. Two 72-hour periods of continuous ingest with and without agitation.
>>     No validation is necessary but the cluster should be checked to ensure
>> it
>>     is still functional.
>>
>> Is the intention on each of these lines to have 4 total test periods?
>>
>> That is does number 1, for example, mean I need
>>
>> Period 1: 24 hr LongClean with agitation
>> Period 2: 24 hr LongClean with agitation
>> Period 3: 24 hr LongClean without agitation
>> Period 4: 24 hr LongClean without agitation
>>
>> Or is the intention for number 1 to mean:
>>
>> Period 1: 24 hr LongClean with agitation
>> Period 2: 24 hr LongClean without agitation
>>
>> Presuming we quickly have consensus, does anyone feel I'd need a [VOTE]
>> thread to rewrite the section to match, or would the [DISCUSS] thread be
>> sufficient?
>>
>>
>> -Sean
>>
>> [1]: http://accumulo.apache.org/governance/releasing.html#cluster-based
>>
>

Mime
View raw message