accumulo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From ke...@deenlo.com
Subject Re: Review Request 19790: ACCUMULO-378 Design document
Date Mon, 31 Mar 2014 16:21:40 GMT

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19790/#review39051
-----------------------------------------------------------



docs/src/main/resources/design/ACCUMULO-378-design.mdtext
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/19790/#comment71439>

    Can a table be replicated to multiple clusters?  



docs/src/main/resources/design/ACCUMULO-378-design.mdtext
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/19790/#comment71438>

    Whats the rational for replicating WAL as opposed to replicating minor compacted rfiles?
 What are the pros and cons? One con w/ WALs is that they could possibly contain a lot of
data for tables that are not being replicated.  This data would need to be filtered. 


- kturner


On March 28, 2014, 5:54 p.m., kturner wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/19790/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 28, 2014, 5:54 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for accumulo.
> 
> 
> Bugs: ACCUMULO-378
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-378
> 
> 
> Repository: accumulo
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> ACCUMULO-378 Design document.  Posting for review here, not meant for commit.  Final
version of document should be posted on issue.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   docs/src/main/resources/design/ACCUMULO-378-design.mdtext PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19790/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> kturner
> 
>


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message