Mailing-List: contact dev-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@accumulo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of josh.elser@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.219.44 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAFAMeYKrTbqbAyaht8UB3JLb+XKjBqMV8Og-Si6dRyvmriCv6Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <52FC08B4.8030609@gmail.com>
	<CAL5zq9YPByQ7L=aT_2MeYrvPUM0Lp-3NkLKbtgqh4OPZ6K5yBg@mail.gmail.com>
	<530543B4.20409@gmail.com>
	<CAGUtCHrsNYn0ACc2i6ZM6=xe+bMOaY50ctBraYroN44EM3=njQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<530557F4.1030701@gmail.com>
	<CAFAMeYKrTbqbAyaht8UB3JLb+XKjBqMV8Og-Si6dRyvmriCv6Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 08:06:58 -0800
Message-ID: 
 <CAOyNEs6bsosPxX3rGNRzNvMOUOO00Wad8KVDFZUg5XcdJKA3Rw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] 1.5.1-RC2
From: Josh Elser <josh.elser@gmail.com>
To: dev@accumulo.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0117696feb877e04f2d8b18d

--089e0117696feb877e04f2d8b18d
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

No, Mike, this was actively happening yesterday afternoon/evening. I found
one more ticket that was being omitted later too, so it's possible that
jira is even more wrong without our knowing
On Feb 20, 2014 6:42 AM, "Mike Drob" <madrob@cloudera.com> wrote:

> As of yesterday, JIRA has been re-indexed[1], so I think searches should be
> working more correctly now.
>
> https://twitter.com/infrabot/statuses/436062268527501312
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 8:18 PM, Josh Elser <josh.elser@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I just diff'ed what Jira generated and what I had (removing issues that
> > were duplicate/invalid/etc), I found two issues that Jira did not report
> > correctly.
> >
> > In talking with Keith, it looks like the Jira indices might be
> > corrupted/out-of-date? ACCUMULO-1626 and ACCUMULO-1630 are reliably not
> > appearing in any searches (when they previously did).
> >
> > https://confluence.atlassian.com/display/JIRAKB/Issues+are+
> > not+appearing+in+Issue+Navigator+search+or+Dashboards
> >
> >
> > On 2/19/14, 4:46 PM, Keith Turner wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Josh Elser <josh.elser@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>  The CHANGES file in 1.5.1-RC2 is only the changes in 1.5.1
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> So the diff[1] on which all of this discussion was based is the RC1 diff
> >> for CHANGES. In another thread we learned that the CHANGES files was not
> >> generated via Jira.  I sorted the file generated by jira and the file
> from
> >> RC2 and they have differences.  I have not looked at all cases, but one
> >> was
> >> odd.  ACCUMULO-1626 is not in the jira generated release notes but is in
> >> the Josh generated ones?????????? That issue is marked for 1.5.1.  I
> give
> >> up for now :)
> >>
> >> [1] :
> >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=accumulo.git;a=commitdiff;h=
> >> d277321d176b71753d391f896f09dc9785173cb0
> >>
> >> <https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=accumulo.git;a=commitdiff;h=
> >> d277321d176b71753d391f896f09dc9785173cb0>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>> On 2/19/14, 3:47 PM, Christopher wrote:
> >>>
> >>>  If, on the other hand, I'm
> >>>> misunderstanding, and this list is 1.5.1 only, and not a mix, then my
> >>>> -1 can change to a +1, because I don't have a preference to include
> >>>> 1.5.0 changes or not... only that they not be mixed confusingly.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
>

--089e0117696feb877e04f2d8b18d--