Mailing-List: contact dev-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@accumulo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of josh.elser@gmail.com designates
 209.85.214.174 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAOyNEs5aNYDWBTi4RPrfpB-zyJuyR2j20RLz3XMPuPqsA7n7wA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <530BEB7F.9040802@gmail.com>
	<CAGUtCHo5csr7dT-qF-dRr7aX9e-K+rG2SimQ9K-115u5=LPBfg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAOyNEs5aNYDWBTi4RPrfpB-zyJuyR2j20RLz3XMPuPqsA7n7wA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 21:02:54 -0500
Message-ID: 
 <CAOyNEs6OMrYSHn_9pXF5=JqY_RG9smWcDpWzXf3f1b52MB6sfg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.5.1-RC3
From: Josh Elser <josh.elser@gmail.com>
To: dev@accumulo.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1134c8f8067d4004f36dd626

--001a1134c8f8067d4004f36dd626
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

(Semi) answering my own question:

Looks like hsync (HDFS-744) has a fix version of 2.0.2. There was some talk
about getting that in the 1.0 line but I don't see a resolution for that.
I'm also not sure how sync was done (if it all reliably?) in the hadoop 1
line.
On Feb 27, 2014 8:28 PM, josh.elser@gmail.com wrote:

> I was actually planning to write up some release notes after the fact
> (probably throw them up by the download link).
>
> I am on my phone, but I thought the mutation queue size affected 1.5 and
> greater (read as hdfs wal), not just hadoop 2.2.0. My memory could also
> just be failing me.
> On Feb 27, 2014 7:38 PM, "Keith Turner" <keith@deenlo.com> wrote:
>
>> I have not voted because of the Hadoop 2.2.0 performance issue.   I spoke
>> w/ Christopher about this he suggested that if we had release notes this
>> would not be a problem.  So it seems like our options for 1.5.1-RC3 and
>> 1905 are the following.
>>
>>  1. Ingore it
>>  2. Create release notes that prominently mentions the Hadoop 2.2.0
>> performance issue and workarounds
>>  3. Create a  1.5.1-RC4 w/ different a different default for
>> tserver.mutation.queue.max
>>
>> I don't mind creating the release notes.  I am still puzzling over what
>> the
>> best option is for the long term.
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 8:01 PM, Josh Elser <josh.elser@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > All,
>> >
>> > Please consider the following candidate as Apache Accumulo 1.5.1 -- now
>> > with 100% more CHANGES changes.
>> >
>> > Git artifacts: The staging repository was built from the tag "1.5.1-rc3"
>> > (3478f71a).
>> >
>> > Maven Staging Repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>> > orgapacheaccumulo-1002
>> >
>> > Source tarball: http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>> > orgapacheaccumulo-1002/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.5.
>> > 1/accumulo-1.5.1-src.tar.gz
>> >
>> > Binary tarball: http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>> > orgapacheaccumulo-1002/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.5.
>> > 1/accumulo-1.5.1-bin.tar.gz
>> >
>> > Changes since 1.5.1-RC2: ACCUMULO-2324, ACCUMULO-2361, ACCUMULO-2369,
>> > ACCUMULO-2378, ACCUMULO-2379, ACCUMULO-2380, ACCUMULO-2385,
>> ACCUMULO-2387,
>> > ACCUMULO-2390
>> >
>> > Keys: http://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS
>> >
>> > Final CHANGES:
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=accumulo.git;a=
>> > blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=3478f71ae888f8d73aaa93837319a6dbb4ba0c8a
>> >
>> > Testing: Unit test and auto-tests passed successfully. Ran a short
>> (~2hrs)
>> > CI on 6 node installation. Ran a brief (~1hr) CI test on one machine
>> with
>> > the newly-released Hadoop-2.3.0. Built from src tarball, and verified
>> > functionality with bin tarball.
>> >
>> > Since there are very minor changes compared to 1.5.1-RC2, this vote will
>> > be open for the next 72 hours (2/28/2014 0100 UTC).
>> >
>> > Upon successful completion of this vote, a 1.5.1 gpg-signed Git tag will
>> > be created from 3478f71a and the above staging repository will be
>> promoted.
>> >
>> > - Josh
>> >
>>
>

--001a1134c8f8067d4004f36dd626--