Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6540B11E78 for ; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 17:47:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 95653 invoked by uid 500); 20 Feb 2014 17:47:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 95598 invoked by uid 500); 20 Feb 2014 17:47:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@accumulo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 95590 invoked by uid 99); 20 Feb 2014 17:47:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 17:47:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of josh.elser@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.51 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.51] (HELO mail-pb0-f51.google.com) (209.85.160.51) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 17:47:50 +0000 Received: by mail-pb0-f51.google.com with SMTP id un15so2198576pbc.24 for ; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 09:47:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=nUeZtNyB6xl9Lqbur3Ik9wemZVyijmNG7ze44LXju6U=; b=lITRmuL3+ZFhMAtys0oJ03yrXVaitGoySd85BcnJAkKG+/0GzEwLW4sYXF+OMM2jo4 dzirGtYFaGUcly+XCvHDq0sqLVAAlo0kdOmm6geuzSBoOq4HTWRcR+87nkXC9fiZOe4R JFakASGJr2xM1C5G/RasiSnI0NcDQxkaraPP7JVNyivZqr2FcF59aJ52xY1TK68i5o+m BUElyDrEX/pFDIn6pB8QJUlIwWOVm/gk8/pJOrPNTYjAk+YSPC6HW6JGckIgoIqjQV8a fWN73JrkxntfdM4n2wIJBsBFtJ6CxTPVnmy++HEDjwfkU/suxYRxnswV7Ecy7rMePDOv Xjug== X-Received: by 10.67.22.100 with SMTP id hr4mr3557367pad.112.1392918450412; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 09:47:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from HW10447.local ([192.175.27.2]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id sy2sm13200703pbc.28.2014.02.20.09.47.29 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 20 Feb 2014 09:47:29 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <53063FB0.80504@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 09:47:28 -0800 From: Josh Elser User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@accumulo.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CHANGES Documents References: <53052278.8050402@gmail.com> <530553AF.30607@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 2/20/14, 9:31 AM, Keith Turner wrote: > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 9:18 PM, Sean Busbeywrote: > >> >I think excluding tickets that aren't resolved is a good idea, but we'll >> >need to document that there may be commits that reference issues not >> >present in CHANGES because we are CtR. >> > > > I think that if an issue has commits against it should be marked for the > release and closed. If needed edit the issue to align with what was > commited and open follow on issues if needed. > Yeah, I think you're right. It's much easier to ensure that Jira is the ultimate source of correctness for what fixes/improvements/etc are contained in a release. Much easier to query Jira than try to guess at what extra should be added.