Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 43CB51087F for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 16:38:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 18093 invoked by uid 500); 5 Feb 2014 16:38:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 18053 invoked by uid 500); 5 Feb 2014 16:38:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@accumulo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 18042 invoked by uid 99); 5 Feb 2014 16:38:25 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 16:38:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of josh.elser@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.50 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.50] (HELO mail-qa0-f50.google.com) (209.85.216.50) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 16:38:21 +0000 Received: by mail-qa0-f50.google.com with SMTP id cm18so885031qab.37 for ; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 08:38:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=q12o2odvPf8rYGUdlUMxTFweiwJpZ4pSIOAjBzD6Reo=; b=NZ4u+CQuETwB/XOij4jA5N08EpV5nzsvF4oLL3QanCbKQ18I0Hd0T/twq2rLzVhtCQ r4HViStGx37y0vdEnUCDOcraG6wcfkDmRKrViE/licbq8eq8Px9CZCeeQY943awG7/FO 7uoQAr2U6lhh3JDtJyBv2nUSGrqRnU7hWGw+m/rn3MVRWcMe3alM0Wl8Ni8MRHaaXcwY btjfcj1pI6MvjMAlK6csAG5wDLeaVckEAMbARC73JMCkTWk+x6kKz6vOnuTCQZuK4etF /NztPoPVUd3GEoajNsVp+bTEDq9/p4PZJlM3v+EGp5y60wSHDV17aMuLUBuBey/1Jsz0 3H6w== X-Received: by 10.224.43.144 with SMTP id w16mr4098957qae.93.1391618280469; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 08:38:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from HW10447.local (pool-173-69-177-34.bltmmd.fios.verizon.net. [173.69.177.34]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id f5sm78400867qas.11.2014.02.05.08.37.59 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 05 Feb 2014 08:37:59 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <52F268EA.6030108@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 11:38:02 -0500 From: Josh Elser User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@accumulo.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] 1.5.1-RC1 References: <52F1BE29.2080607@gmail.com> <52F264EF.9030904@gmail.com> <52F2683F.40609@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <52F2683F.40609@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Ack - No, these jars are not the same, because testing was about a 3-4 week endeavor. As such, multiple bug fixes were applied to the code base to fix test cases. So, no: the jars were not the same; however, the changes that were made across these tests that I run were of little consequence. I can provide you the SHA1's from each test I ran if you want cross-reference each test with the changes that were made. On 2/5/14, 11:35 AM, Josh Elser wrote: > No > > On 2/5/14, 11:31 AM, Mike Drob wrote: >> Are the jars in the repository the same ones that got loaded onto your >> clusters for testing? >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Josh Elser wrote: >> >>> No, the jars in the repo were built against the default profile. I >>> omitted >>> saying that I used the `assemble/build.sh --create-release-candidate` as >>> the baseline. The profiles it activates are the ones I used. >>> >>> Although all of this shouldn't even matter. We haven't needed to build >>> against specific profiles for quite some time now in >=1.5. >>> >>> >>> On 2/5/14, 11:16 AM, Mike Drob wrote: >>> >>>> Are the jars in the staging repository built against the Hadoop 2 >>>> profile >>>> as well, then? I was under the impression that Hadoop 1 was still the >>>> default profile. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 10:11 AM, Josh Elser >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hadoop: 2.2.0 >>>>> Zookeeper: 3.4.5. >>>>> On Feb 5, 2014 9:56 AM, "Mike Drob" wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Which version of hadoop/zookeeper did you test against for the >>>>> cluster >>>>>> tests? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 11:29 PM, Josh Elser >>>>>> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> All, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Please consider the following candidate as Apache Accumulo 1.5.1 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Git artifacts: The staging repository was built from the branch >>>>>>> "1.5.1-rc1" (09e420bb). No accompanying git tag was created yet >>>>>>> (as it >>>>>>> would be the same exact thing as providing the above SHA1). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Maven Staged Repo: >>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ >>>>>>> orgapacheaccumulo-1000/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Source tarball: http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ >>>>>>> orgapacheaccumulo-1000/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.5. >>>>>>> 1/accumulo-1.5.1-src.tar.gz >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Changes since 1.5.0: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/ >>>>>>> repos/asf?p=accumulo.git;a=commitdiff;h=d277321d176b71753d391f896f09dc >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 9785173cb0 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Keys: http://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Testing: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> All required tests as prescribed by the release guidelines[1] were >>>>>>> successfully completed. Randomwalk and continuous-ingest tests were >>>>>>> completed on a 6-node installation. JUnit and functional tests >>>>>>> >>>>>> successfully >>>>>> >>>>>>> completed on a single Linux box. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This vote will be open for the next 72 hours. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Upon successful completion of this vote, a 1.5.1 gpg-signed Git tag >>>>>>> >>>>>> will >>>>> >>>>>> be created from 09e420bb and the above staging repository will be >>>>>>> >>>>>> promoted. >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - Josh >>>>>>> >>>>>>> [1] http://accumulo.apache.org/governance/releasing.html >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>