accumulo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Keith Turner <ke...@deenlo.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Accumulo Bylaws
Date Wed, 19 Feb 2014 19:57:40 GMT
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Sean Busbey <busbey+lists@cloudera.com>wrote:

> If people have substantive questions (as opposed to requests for edits /
> clarification), I'd rather they be here on the list.
>

Mike made a comment on the 1.5.1-RC2 vote about bylaws and the release
guide [1].  Seems like this should be rolled into the by-laws we will vote
on.


[1] http://accumulo.apache.org/governance/releasing.html#releasing


>
> My main issue is the automatic transition to emeritus status for committers
> / PMCs at 6 months. That's a significant change. Do we know what the
> current impact of that would be?
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Bill Havanki <bhavanki@clouderagovt.com
> >wrote:
>
> > I have some minor edits and some questions about it, which I'll add as
> > comments in the doc. I also agree that a weather allowance is a good
> idea.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 9:49 AM, Mike Drob <madrob@cloudera.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks for putting it in a Google Doc, Arshak!
> > >
> > > What issues do y'all see with this document in it's current state?
> > > Personally, I think it looks fine and would be willing to start a vote
> on
> > > it, but I get the impression that east coast weather has prevented some
> > > folk from looking at it, so maybe another couple of days is fine.
> > >
> > > Mike
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 7:18 AM, Arshak Navruzyan <arshakn@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Oops, yes of course!  It's editable.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 7:01 PM, Bill Havanki <
> > bhavanki@clouderagovt.com
> > > > >wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Thanks Arshak! Can you either allow editing or commenting?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 6:10 PM, Arshak Navruzyan <
> arshakn@gmail.com
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Say no more ...
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1uR8vhIQcKGA6IEtbbF5D7UL_e6WGtfXMUQHp8Fwvg_E/edit?usp=sharing
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Christopher <
> ctubbsii@apache.org>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Perhaps some ambitious volunteer could start a collaborative
> > draft
> > > of
> > > > > > > Accumulo's bylaws in Google Docs or something, using ZK
as a
> > > starting
> > > > > > > point. After it stabilizes a bit, we could push it to the
> project
> > > > > > > webpage as a draft and vote on it?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Christopher L Tubbs II
> > > > > > > http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 2:11 PM, Mike Drob <
> madrob@cloudera.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > I didn't get that impression from reading their document.
> > While C
> > > > and
> > > > > > PMC
> > > > > > > > are two distinct roles, there is nothing stating that
there
> > > cannot
> > > > be
> > > > > > > > overlap, and the fact that there is 100% overlap is
entirely
> > > > > > orthogonal.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Josh Elser <
> > > josh.elser@gmail.com
> > > > >
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> This would change the existing Committer == PMC,
no?
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> That's the biggest thing I noticed scanning over
the
> document.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> On 2/14/14, 1:19 PM, Mike Drob wrote:
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>> I think we should have some Bylaws, as that
gives us more
> > > > structure
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > > >>> operate under.
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>> I propose that we adopt the ZooKeeper bylaws,
replacing all
> > > > > > references
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > >>> ZK with Accumulo.
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>> http://zookeeper.apache.org/bylaws.html
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>> What say ye?
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>> Mike
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message