accumulo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Bill Havanki <bhava...@clouderagovt.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Accumulo Bylaws and Commit and Review
Date Thu, 20 Feb 2014 22:25:27 GMT
I'll make edits to the bylaw doc in accordance with the above. Please feel
free to still comment here.


On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Bill Havanki <bhavanki@clouderagovt.com>wrote:

> There are a couple of spots in the proposed bylaws that imply, or call
> for, details on how the project handles commits and code reviews. While
> that process should be spelled out, I believe that the work is significant
> enough that it should be refactored into its own effort, and the bylaws
> merely refer to it.
>
> Here are the spots I found, which have also been commented upon in the doc.
>
> 1. Voting: -1 may be applied to a commit.
> 2. Actions table: Code Change as lazy approval.
>
> I'm not saying the current state is correct or not, as it's just what was
> present for ZK when Arshak made the copy. My suggestion is to replace the
> statements in the bylaws with referral to our Commit and Review standards,
> to be published later (hopefully not RSN [1]).
>
> Thoughts?
>
> [1] http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=real+soon+now
>
> --
> | - - -
> | Bill Havanki
> | Solutions Architect, Cloudera Government Solutions
> | - - -
>



-- 
| - - -
| Bill Havanki
| Solutions Architect, Cloudera Government Solutions
| - - -

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message