accumulo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Josh Elser <josh.el...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] CHANGES Documents
Date Thu, 20 Feb 2014 17:47:28 GMT
On 2/20/14, 9:31 AM, Keith Turner wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 9:18 PM, Sean Busbey<busbey+lists@cloudera.com>wrote:
>
>> >I think excluding tickets that aren't resolved is a good idea, but we'll
>> >need to document that there may be commits that reference issues not
>> >present in CHANGES because we are CtR.
>> >
>
> I think that if an issue has commits against it should be marked for the
> release and closed.  If needed edit the issue to align with what was
> commited and open follow on issues if needed.
>

Yeah, I think you're right. It's much easier to ensure that Jira is the 
ultimate source of correctness for what fixes/improvements/etc are 
contained in a release. Much easier to query Jira than try to guess at 
what extra should be added.

Mime
View raw message