accumulo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Josh Elser <josh.el...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] CHANGES Documents
Date Thu, 20 Feb 2014 01:00:31 GMT
One extra thing: in the CHANGES that I generated, I excluded any tickets 
that didn't have a status of "Closed" or "Resolved".

Not sure what people think about that.

On 2/19/14, 1:30 PM, Josh Elser wrote:
> The CHANGES document that is included in an Accumulo release contains
> some set of changes from a previous release which presently contain the
> following information:
>
> 1) Issue Type (Task, Bug, Feature, etc)
> 2) Issue Number (ACCUMULO-1234)
> 3) Issue Subject
>
> There have been various preferences expressed, primarily over IRC, on
> which changes should be contained and how they should be formatted. The
> largest consensus, and what I believe we should do, is as follows:
>
> Entries in a CHANGES file should contain issues, delimited by minor
> version within the major version[1], grouped by issue type. The minor
> version changes sorted be sorted in reverse order (e.g. 1.5.2, 1.5.1,
> then 1.5.0). Changes from the previous major version (e.g. 1.4.x) would
> *not* be included in this CHANGES file.
>
> Opinions? The results of this discussion will be documented on the
> release-making page[2] of the website for future reference.
>
> - Josh
>
> [1] Major and minor version here is referred to as Y and Z of version
> strings of the form: X.Y.Z (not as prescribed by semver, proper)
> [2] http://accumulo.apache.org/releasing.html

Mime
View raw message