accumulo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Josh Elser <josh.el...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] 1.5.1-RC2
Date Thu, 20 Feb 2014 00:44:57 GMT
Just noticed that I misspoke earlier in this thread.

The CHANGES in RC2 were *only* the 1.5.1 changes with 1.5.0 changes 
omitted. I had initially said that it was the combination of 1.5.0 and 
1.5.1 but this was something that I had done, but did not end up in the 
final RC2.

On 2/19/14, 11:59 AM, Josh Elser wrote:
> I don't 100% recall (although I could probably dig through IRC logs).
>
> Christopher initially told me "we've previously just included the
> changes for that release, not recorded a history of previous releases".
> I believe he recommended that the CHANGES file shouldn't even include
> 1.5.0 changes (although he did say that he doesn't care for the CHANGES
> file at all).
>
> a27f60b2 can likely be reverted and this will bring back the 1.5.0
> changes beneath the 1.5.1 changes. This is what I would prefer, tbh, but
> we have nothing firm.
>
> On 2/19/14, 10:02 AM, Sean Busbey wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 11:50 AM, Keith Turner <keith@deenlo.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Josh Elser <josh.elser@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I had put out a question a couple of different times in IRC about this,
>>>> actually.
>>>>
>>>> I originally had it broken down into 1.5.1 changes, with 1.5.0 changes
>>>> listed below. Others (I don't remember who) didn't care for this
>>>> approach
>>>> so I lumped all of the 1.5.x changes together in one block.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Why?  What was the rationale for doing this?
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I would also like to hear rationale.  ATM I'm inclined to -1
>>

Mime
View raw message