Mailing-List: contact dev-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@accumulo.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <52D5E28E.5080202@gmail.com>
References: <52D45DB1.2000700@gmail.com>
	<CAGUtCHq29wRegpRDOsjxXxGLEKdTU0rsPA5oWyETGZHWU0TOPQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<52D47F08.2060202@gmail.com>
	<CAL5zq9bDDTGt6JdzaLnJMPbRk3cdrPQQDS0N9xuR18CUwxho3Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<52D5E28E.5080202@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 14:33:00 -0500
Message-ID: 
 <CAL5zq9ZH9gyhazJzs1cyusx8FvQwEbt9ugRQ4hgdp7boYiT1mA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Thrift 0.9.1
From: Christopher <ctubbsii@apache.org>
To: Accumulo Dev List <dev@accumulo.apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

I agree that 1.6.1 might be a better target. Cassandra had a similar
issue, and their solution was to basically re-implement more of the
thrift code in their own code. Prior to that, they basically had an
identical solution to ours for 0.9.0.

--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii


On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 8:21 PM, Josh Elser <josh.elser@gmail.com> wrote:
> If you can work around it to support both 0.9.0 and 0.9.1, I personally
> wouldn't have any objections to seeing that change done in 1.6.1.
>
> I don't want to see it slow down 1.6.0 more though, either.
>
>
> On 1/14/14, 8:06 PM, Christopher wrote:
>>
>> Personally, I'd like to see this done... because I'd like to, at some
>> point, get Accumulo packaged into Fedora, and Thrift 0.9.1 is packaged
>> for Fedora 20 (as well as Hadoop 2.2 and ZooKeeper 3.4). If this isn't
>> done, a downstream patch will have to be made to package it for
>> Fedora, or I'd have to wait until some version after 1.6.0. It's not a
>> priority, certainly... but it would be quite useful to support either
>> 0.9.0 or 0.9.1.
>>
>> --
>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 7:04 PM, Josh Elser <josh.elser@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Ah, thanks, Keith. I apologize for my ignorance.
>>>
>>> I thought it was odd that we weren't using it already.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 1/13/14, 6:26 PM, Keith Turner wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This was looked into and a problem was encountered ACCUMULO-1691
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Josh Elser <josh.elser@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Should we be updating to Thrift-0.9.1 before 1.6.0?
>>>>>
>>>>> Looks like https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-1869 has the
>>>>> potential to affect us, although it is possible for us to bypass the
>>>>> issue
>>>>> by providing our own ExecutorService.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>