Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3573A10940 for ; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 20:16:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 91263 invoked by uid 500); 8 Nov 2013 20:16:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 91233 invoked by uid 500); 8 Nov 2013 20:16:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@accumulo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 91224 invoked by uid 99); 8 Nov 2013 20:16:09 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Nov 2013 20:16:09 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO mail-la0-f54.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username ctubbsii, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Nov 2013 20:16:08 +0000 Received: by mail-la0-f54.google.com with SMTP id hp15so1298208lab.27 for ; Fri, 08 Nov 2013 12:16:06 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=WnbfJ24lRO2n2PQKfAy9R9UI+BFalTG3QXrvzsJ00u4=; b=UNiscjJ0gKzDxnuzWXktRGEgJSLLeJANmvQv+JuLMzHK6+XKQZkbWmP3P76SM251iZ lqR1u/QOrIqxXcHQUh3csZ9hBUxmU+3Dd4LsfWGeou4yRXM2tP8KAX3khX0zSHCGSt4c 8XI2Wx041ar4wp+7fLeQFvUb4t4FgooXknvl7K373x/lPv3t6YQlayFhpN6vvCnCYu4S MdlfqfULouwFAxxis7A15l3BHvzd4/Jo314+2AKCmUK3IEJ8Z65RddTVdXEVJ4iq0mgz kjoqBm8oJ8BXdMmF+idIcVApog+j+H4BJnht7jeYKlgqombynFXOknHry+igWS6Jlejk JtrQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.52.33 with SMTP id q1mr11898130lbo.30.1383941766937; Fri, 08 Nov 2013 12:16:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.177.231 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 12:16:06 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 15:16:06 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: mvn dependency:analyze From: Christopher To: Accumulo Dev List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 We won't be able to get rid of all the resulting warnings. So, automating it would probably just encourage people to ignore these warnings instead of address them. I'd rather just make it a point to explicitly check during testing before releasing, and to encourage people to consider dependencies throughout development. -- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 2:29 PM, Mike Drob wrote: > +1 > > Nobody looks at dependency resolution until it bites you in the rear. > > We could conceivably add this to the pom to automate the running, but would > still need to make sure that somebody reads the output. > > > On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Billie Rinaldi wrote: > >> I would like to add running mvn dependency:analyze as a step in our release >> process. This should be done with both major and minor releases, as it is >> very easy to add new direct dependencies without realizing it (when they >> were previously transitive dependencies), or to leave around dependencies >> that are no longer needed. >> >> Billie >>