Mailing-List: contact dev-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@accumulo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of mdrob@mdrob.com designates
 209.85.128.181 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CABwccFG=8qGzUXbTSDupSuHdnC3Xgp7iFBw_UUXrrMaNBMv_5A@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAF1jEfB6BwY5_78=9BaUJtSp5bkLCw=rgV84DE9FqADyfxB_=Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJRvFdqb2OagRe1nHTKiL3v_K=4PTj4yY5oGwLu4mAgRCy5U2A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABwccFG=8qGzUXbTSDupSuHdnC3Xgp7iFBw_UUXrrMaNBMv_5A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 14:38:20 -0500
Message-ID: 
 <CAJRvFdqAndCHsASZ7RzHLZKze=3d_wbETTH+h6MjUnU0Xzx7iw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: mvn dependency:analyze
From: Mike Drob <mdrob@mdrob.com>
To: dev@accumulo.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0149ca3a59292704eaaf8656

--089e0149ca3a59292704eaaf8656
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

I feel like that would be very flaky. Reflection can cause some weird
dependency graphs that maven is not able to follow.


On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Sean Busbey <busbey+ml@clouderagovt.com>wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Mike Drob <mdrob@mdrob.com> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Nobody looks at dependency resolution until it bites you in the rear.
> >
> > We could conceivably add this to the pom to automate the running, but
> would
> > still need to make sure that somebody reads the output.
> >
>
>
> The release build script could read the output and fail if needed, yes?
>
> --
> Sean
>

--089e0149ca3a59292704eaaf8656--