Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-7439-apmail-accumulo-dev-archive=accumulo.apache.org@accumulo.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4E8FD10008
	for <apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Thu, 14 Nov 2013 22:42:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 20585 invoked by uid 500); 14 Nov 2013 22:42:26 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@accumulo.apache.org
Received: (qmail 20558 invoked by uid 500); 14 Nov 2013 22:42:26 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@accumulo.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@accumulo.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@accumulo.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.accumulo.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@accumulo.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@accumulo.apache.org
Received: (qmail 20544 invoked by uid 99); 14 Nov 2013 22:42:26 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 22:42:26 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0
	tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jvines@gmail.com designates
 209.85.215.41 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.215.41] (HELO mail-la0-f41.google.com) (209.85.215.41)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 22:42:20 +0000
Received: by mail-la0-f41.google.com with SMTP id hp15so2157450lab.14
        for <multiple recipients>; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 14:41:59 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type;
        bh=k10utRsBQp2rNY/Fl0KX8hTByI6+GXFkRDPU1/RV0c0=;
        b=mlJKpMGqJ7GrkNuqyf1/Agc44TmhcZPUYA36KwIs8oJi9E3+UdJazL4b6W6gicXy9Z
         NxG2fo/Dg+ekV3b2bAvncMxdaUuukfkkv8t+rZzexzfLnTHFhyGkrXkDtXXM/7mq2d7V
         YKZFYi/Bf00Gb1tYmF7zMeDSKvTpbOdFYzjQXTWL49TfQSlhsoK0I5D+A04mUQa7RecN
         jHV1akOXRN/OyegbhsQ87/7btoHN6uaSE5sARO3Z1SrOp2yYMLNo3ws87deTxNPt16n/
         TffPkMGo1BBSPgLDLrho/jTZ+YlJZgzGwEP6aCTQ/McGFTylAGtF9v+3UCmdke/AJGC4
         wu4Q==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.134.134 with SMTP id pk6mr921325lbb.70.1384468918665;
 Thu, 14 Nov 2013 14:41:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.114.99.99 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 14:41:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.114.99.99 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 14:41:58 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <5285373D.7040103@gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAGUtCHoWhPBM7-HNo2FSGFiCars1thfu2fU677eWNTgvhfXZrw@mail.gmail.com>
	<5285373D.7040103@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 17:41:58 -0500
Message-ID: 
 <CADczPYTv3o3fu9dNTOdPkcwjum5guGhTRng1ngeai1ZONV_Qnw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Deprecate mock in 1.6.0
From: John Vines <jvines@gmail.com>
To: Accumulo Dev List <dev@accumulo.apache.org>
Cc: user@accumulo.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e01175e7d1986d304eb2aca8a
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

--089e01175e7d1986d304eb2aca8a
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Sent from my phone, please pardon the typos and brevity.
On Nov 14, 2013 2:49 PM, "Josh Elser" <josh.elser@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Been bitten by goofy/half-implemented stuff in Mock too many times. I'd
rather see effort placed into making MAC a reliable and fast testing
mechanism than helping Mock limp along

-1

MAC isn't there yet and I don't think we should deprecate it without a
suitable alternative in place

>
>
> On 11/14/13, 12:41 PM, Keith Turner wrote:
>>
>> Should we deprecate mock accumulo for 1.6.0?  This was considered [1] for
>> 1.5.0.  I started thinking about this because I never added conditional
>> writer to mock.
>>
>> [1] : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-878
>>

--089e01175e7d1986d304eb2aca8a--