Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-7440-apmail-accumulo-dev-archive=accumulo.apache.org@accumulo.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E64F910022
	for <apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Thu, 14 Nov 2013 22:43:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 22317 invoked by uid 500); 14 Nov 2013 22:43:42 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@accumulo.apache.org
Received: (qmail 22246 invoked by uid 500); 14 Nov 2013 22:43:42 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@accumulo.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@accumulo.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@accumulo.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.accumulo.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@accumulo.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@accumulo.apache.org
Received: (qmail 22231 invoked by uid 99); 14 Nov 2013 22:43:42 -0000
Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 22:43:42 +0000
Received: from localhost (HELO mail-lb0-f172.google.com) (127.0.0.1)
  (smtp-auth username vines, mechanism plain)
  by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP;
 Thu, 14 Nov 2013 22:43:42 +0000
Received: by mail-lb0-f172.google.com with SMTP id c11so2148535lbj.3
        for <multiple recipients>; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 14:43:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
        h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
         :subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
        bh=xzprIA3WbrWGdDvRuEAcHPiiKWccWktPFa4REwEmBok=;
        b=JU0EC6hpdTnnAGGZ8co6eULWEtBMCsKmi372Z0ayqe1HqKG24sMAEKIjvym3T8IPB4
         f+Kig6lHaES71JPdzDestPyYE5R0Qg5vuKMhzJheuJz6kPdmQulDFn1KbhmQauyqZ8b8
         YEN1lgwoKW6rA6q7Vyr19AIkq9909GwOMx1l9RDGqVVdvpJvSs1Mwq/nBRfbQ2zD1Fj/
         oW4pJQerJ0ZA1ZbtLHEIYK5doTKAQra3egtcD/1+av/5ALDIS26lkKCSGTLsNDn5CQNW
         yIFweylys8ha0ihEbO33GPVG1a5oDpUnAu+Z42zHZFQ5CHp1JJ/wadXImXi7RO0tAucd
         QhDg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.72.233 with SMTP id g9mr2083363lbv.2.1384469020409; Thu,
 14 Nov 2013 14:43:40 -0800 (PST)
Reply-To: vines@apache.org
Received: by 10.114.99.99 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 14:43:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.114.99.99 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 14:43:40 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <5285373D.7040103@gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAGUtCHoWhPBM7-HNo2FSGFiCars1thfu2fU677eWNTgvhfXZrw@mail.gmail.com>
	<5285373D.7040103@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 17:43:40 -0500
Message-ID: 
 <CADczPYTs=gLXGvH5_SJ=SBKTpmoWk82pG-w8P65M4D65bFMJ6A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Deprecate mock in 1.6.0
From: John Vines <vines@apache.org>
To: Accumulo Dev List <dev@accumulo.apache.org>
Cc: user@accumulo.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c23fbc2a07aa04eb2ad0ab

--001a11c23fbc2a07aa04eb2ad0ab
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Sent from my phone, please pardon the typos and brevity.
On Nov 14, 2013 2:49 PM, "Josh Elser" <josh.elser@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Been bitten by goofy/half-implemented stuff in Mock too many times. I'd
rather see effort placed into making MAC a reliable and fast testing
mechanism than helping Mock limp along

-1
We do not have a suitable alternative in place in 1.6 and I don't think we
should deprecate it until there is one.

>
>
> On 11/14/13, 12:41 PM, Keith Turner wrote:
>>
>> Should we deprecate mock accumulo for 1.6.0?  This was considered [1] for
>> 1.5.0.  I started thinking about this because I never added conditional
>> writer to mock.
>>
>> [1] : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-878
>>

--001a11c23fbc2a07aa04eb2ad0ab--