Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7172110D2B for ; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 21:47:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 10271 invoked by uid 500); 8 Nov 2013 21:47:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 10209 invoked by uid 500); 8 Nov 2013 21:47:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@accumulo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 10201 invoked by uid 99); 8 Nov 2013 21:47:48 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Nov 2013 21:47:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of josh.elser@gmail.com designates 209.85.128.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.128.47] (HELO mail-qe0-f47.google.com) (209.85.128.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Nov 2013 21:47:42 +0000 Received: by mail-qe0-f47.google.com with SMTP id b4so2491544qen.20 for ; Fri, 08 Nov 2013 13:47:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=R5OBMuR5IsdeCvEuagVCfkRfD0eX+Dp+U3kQ2hIpTcs=; b=A9aNaYl03fwc6GUG7lzoAphGcG6FiwoqEyiVzntfSFkF1SXUY+nO+jUznGBkRZyaSx HV/MNRMtgEIB0VzCe53msipM+92oLLVI5qa/7BlnLTiCRYOvCb8VhppQLadhWMFymBs2 tfTNI7R5novWb1mGNcFYG7j9SV+Z6ho7bgEd7A5FkB1SHRmF8R1VpOwASm8hKEayIgF7 Kni8R+kOjJ411YKXrXvXEVJstdZgqox5xnOvVf6TwIZ8kJbBhUnvfJ5F0VnInMosjACw PCLDKDwR8rl5GivIm8E+sW+cXF1Cv7caiKJ5pcXMjh7Is+U/vvZb+l1hZQDlHKAEdbB0 g2qg== X-Received: by 10.224.36.201 with SMTP id u9mr27589440qad.76.1383947241894; Fri, 08 Nov 2013 13:47:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from HW10447.local (pool-173-69-177-34.bltmmd.fios.verizon.net. [173.69.177.34]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id u3sm22922613qej.8.2013.11.08.13.47.21 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 08 Nov 2013 13:47:21 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <527D5BE8.9040405@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 16:47:20 -0500 From: Josh Elser User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@accumulo.apache.org Subject: Re: mvn dependency:analyze References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org With 1.6.0, I plan to make a document that will be a more functional (step-by-step) walkthrough. I think I have a ticket somewhere for that. On 11/8/13, 4:19 PM, Sean Busbey wrote: > http://accumulo.apache.org/governance/releasing.html > > Under "Testing" > On Nov 8, 2013 3:14 PM, "Joey Echeverria" wrote: > >> On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Christopher wrote: >>> We won't be able to get rid of all the resulting warnings. So, >>> automating it would probably just encourage people to ignore these >>> warnings instead of address them. I'd rather just make it a point to >>> explicitly check during testing before releasing, and to encourage >>> people to consider dependencies throughout development. >> >> Do we have a document on how to test a release? In particular, I'm >> thinking of a process to follow after an RC is cut to determine if it >> should get a +1 to become the release. >> >> -Joey >> >