accumulo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Bill Havanki <bhava...@clouderagovt.com>
Subject Re: mvn dependency:analyze
Date Fri, 08 Nov 2013 16:01:00 GMT
+1


On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Billie Rinaldi <billie.rinaldi@gmail.com>wrote:

> I'm doing it for 1.6.0.  Rather, I've done it once already, and am willing
> to do it again after the other patches / bug fixes are in.
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Sean Busbey <busbey@clouderagovt.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Sounds reasonable. I presume this wouldn't apply to 1.6.0 since it's in
> > progress? John could still opt to do it.
> >
> > We should include example text of necessary follow-on actions based on
> > results of analyze.
> >
> > Call a vote?
> >
> > --
> > Sean
> > On Nov 8, 2013 9:38 AM, "Billie Rinaldi" <billie.rinaldi@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > I would like to add running mvn dependency:analyze as a step in our
> > release
> > > process.  This should be done with both major and minor releases, as it
> > is
> > > very easy to add new direct dependencies without realizing it (when
> they
> > > were previously transitive dependencies), or to leave around
> dependencies
> > > that are no longer needed.
> > >
> > > Billie
> > >
> >
>



-- 
| - - -
| Bill Havanki
| Solutions Architect, Cloudera Government Solutions
| - - -

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message