Mailing-List: contact dev-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@accumulo.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: vines@apache.org
In-Reply-To: <5267FF52.9000309@gmail.com>
References: <5267FF52.9000309@gmail.com>
From: John Vines <vines@apache.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 13:00:45 -0400
Message-ID: 
 <CADczPYRGu+uBL6ssCra_omk4gCYJ1Z=jJHKMCpJaoCS--TV5BQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Table Namespaces
To: Accumulo Dev List <dev@accumulo.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c3c704b6e7f604e96b7795

--001a11c3c704b6e7f604e96b7795
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Christopher brought this up in the code freeze thread last week. My stance
is it shouldn't be merged in until the 1.6 necessities get wrapped. I don't
have the cycles to give it that TLC though.


On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Josh Elser <josh.elser@gmail.com> wrote:

> https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/ACCUMULO-802<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-802>
>
> I noticed that the namespace code that Sean worked on never got finished
> and committed. Reading through the above ticket, it looks like we're fairly
> close to a minimum acceptable level of functionality for 1.6 (John sums up
> most of these in the most recent comment).
>
> I'd like to try to get this merged in. What does everyone else think?
>

--001a11c3c704b6e7f604e96b7795--