accumulo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sean Busbey <>
Subject Re: 1.6.0 Feature Freeze
Date Thu, 31 Oct 2013 18:26:29 GMT
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Sean Busbey <> wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 12:37 PM, Christopher <> wrote:
>> I think a week extension would be good for projects that are under
>> review, but I don't think it should be extended for development on
>> those features (except to address issues from the review). This would
>> also encourage people to push something potentially disruptive to
>> ReviewBoard instead of committing at the last minute and having to
>> revert it later. That would allow us to review stuff that has been
>> ready, but not committed because people have been busy finishing other
>> features for the feature freeze and haven't had time to review it yet.
> Just to make sure I'm reading this right:
> you're saying we include things that are in review board as of the
> original feature freeze date? And then they get pushed post-feature-freeze
> date once their reviews have iterated to acceptance?

If I am interpreting Chris' proposal correctly, I like it better than a
general one week extension.

In addition to the benefits he lists, I think it also makes us much more
likely to get 1-commit-per-ticket, which I'm a huge fan of.


  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message