accumulo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sean Busbey <>
Subject Re: 1.6.0 Feature Freeze
Date Thu, 31 Oct 2013 17:41:54 GMT
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 12:37 PM, Christopher <> wrote:

> I think a week extension would be good for projects that are under
> review, but I don't think it should be extended for development on
> those features (except to address issues from the review). This would
> also encourage people to push something potentially disruptive to
> ReviewBoard instead of committing at the last minute and having to
> revert it later. That would allow us to review stuff that has been
> ready, but not committed because people have been busy finishing other
> features for the feature freeze and haven't had time to review it yet.
Just to make sure I'm reading this right:

you're saying we include things that are in review board as of the original
feature freeze date? And then they get pushed post-feature-freeze date once
their reviews have iterated to acceptance?


  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message