accumulo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From John Vines <>
Subject Re: Table Namespaces
Date Wed, 23 Oct 2013 17:00:45 GMT
Christopher brought this up in the code freeze thread last week. My stance
is it shouldn't be merged in until the 1.6 necessities get wrapped. I don't
have the cycles to give it that TLC though.

On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Josh Elser <> wrote:

> I noticed that the namespace code that Sean worked on never got finished
> and committed. Reading through the above ticket, it looks like we're fairly
> close to a minimum acceptable level of functionality for 1.6 (John sums up
> most of these in the most recent comment).
> I'd like to try to get this merged in. What does everyone else think?

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message