accumulo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Josh Elser <>
Subject Re: Table Namespaces
Date Wed, 23 Oct 2013 17:22:50 GMT
Ah, I didn't go to the issues last week -- didn't realize that 802 was 
the namespaces.

Have we prioritized what needs to be addressed? Can Christopher get 210 

I feel like we're looking a gift horse in the mouth for not getting 802 
to a good state, but I also don't want to get in a position where we 
have to do a huge revert because we find something terrible with it in 
testing. I don't know.

On 10/23/13 10:00 AM, John Vines wrote:
> Christopher brought this up in the code freeze thread last week. My stance
> is it shouldn't be merged in until the 1.6 necessities get wrapped. I don't
> have the cycles to give it that TLC though.
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Josh Elser <> wrote:
>> I noticed that the namespace code that Sean worked on never got finished
>> and committed. Reading through the above ticket, it looks like we're fairly
>> close to a minimum acceptable level of functionality for 1.6 (John sums up
>> most of these in the most recent comment).
>> I'd like to try to get this merged in. What does everyone else think?

View raw message