Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DA3DA1004A for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 02:39:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 46297 invoked by uid 500); 19 Sep 2013 02:39:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 46155 invoked by uid 500); 19 Sep 2013 02:39:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@accumulo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 46137 invoked by uid 99); 19 Sep 2013 02:39:28 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 02:39:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of mdrob@mdrob.com designates 209.85.212.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.47] (HELO mail-vb0-f47.google.com) (209.85.212.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 02:39:20 +0000 Received: by mail-vb0-f47.google.com with SMTP id h10so5817123vbh.20 for ; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 19:38:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=2KfKis8ycJmQ02JVPMrQI5TtMMmPl3TwonYcHE6eMo4=; b=ZXbiRFf+c+5sp/6Kk+hZZVmJnt64vy5VQW66j20mDCkjd0SemTXSqQnpNtGZlx7O18 AJAiRaOPzkUd2OpDIN9jD393oaPP3lvqFESt6oh9eXjOzwtIJrMT7e1XOiEubP00Y+/T HThY4Ak1nHF66cmjjNhM3pwEOu9WWOsH9INX6L9ikEqFVfn+h3wmuDB8V0R7jsnR0vaf fv5Qymv/2MQKsTrNQlW2TKMAgoJDch1UlP3ipTSXwigaHLMj+TxcxQOibaAS8e9CxWwm GKBmSfFZQdjt5EqokYfX4GK6By12z4PQhQmwmoAFoZrLiokmkoyVnqqqdwcEhl/lcWz5 f0ug== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkiSKZIkrv+rUz2vSwSJIVbZIUFv4cokFy//guT/mlpz1ojZc3/2DbCYYfSYc9dn7xgceZv MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.75.228 with SMTP id f4mr9827865vdw.6.1379558336992; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 19:38:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.221.60.68 with HTTP; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 19:38:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [98.218.52.50] Received: by 10.221.60.68 with HTTP; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 19:38:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <52391BBA.1050509@gmail.com> References: <52391717.10203@gmail.com> <52391BBA.1050509@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 22:38:56 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accumulo Instamo Archetype 1.4.4 From: Mike Drob To: dev@accumulo.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec501633f9fad0604e6b3749d X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --bcaec501633f9fad0604e6b3749d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Ah, so one can make use of the other. Makes sense. Is there a source tar to verify? Or is the only vote for maven artifacts? On Sep 17, 2013 11:19 PM, "Josh Elser" wrote: > Well, a knock on how long this has been in the pipeline -- this was > actually begun before the maven-plugin even came about. > > The big difference between the plugin and the archetype is this: the > plugin would require you to have knowledge about how to make a maven > project, stub out the pom, write some code and then interact with the > minicluster where the archetype provides a working maven project out of the > box with "application examples" of minicluster. > > I think down the road it might be good to leverage the maven plugin inside > of the archetype; however, I'm not super concerned about *some* initial > overlap (take the integration tests in the accumulo repo which spin up a > minicluster instance in @BeforeClass and stop it in @AfterClass). > > Does that make sense? > > On 09/17/2013 11:10 PM, Mike Drob wrote: > >> Josh, >> >> What role does this fill that the Accumulo maven plugin does not? They >> seem >> to address similar needs and I'm worried about duplicated effort. >> On Sep 17, 2013 11:00 PM, "Josh Elser" wrote: >> >> Devs, >>> >>> Please consider the following candidate project as a "sister" release to >>> Apache Accumulo 1.4.4: Apache Accumulo Instamo Archetype 1.4.4 >>> >>> For those unaware, Keith started this as a pet-project on Github, but the >>> two of us worked together to make a Maven archetype from it. As such, >>> this >>> archetype gives a first-time user a way to get an Accumulo MiniCluster >>> instance up and running with only Java and Maven installed with examples >>> that run MapReduce and the Accumulo shell against said MiniCluster. >>> >>> The release has been staged at https://repository.apache.org/**** >>> content/repositories/****orgapacheaccumulo-070/>> /repository.apache.org/**content/repositories/**orgapacheaccumulo-070/>using >>> the instructions found at >>> http://www.apache.org/dev/****publishing-maven-artifacts.****html >>> >>> >. >>> The repository (and tag '1.4.4' which the release was built from) can be >>> found at https://git-wip-us.apache.org/****repos/asf/accumulo-instamo-** >>> ** >>> archetype.git>> accumulo-instamo-archetype.git >>> **> >>> . >>> >>> I did mess up the invocation of the maven-release-plugin when preparing >>> the release which is why the tag is '1.4.4' and not '1.4.4-RC1'. I'll >>> revert my mess if there are problems with this release. >>> >>> This vote will remain open for 72 hours. For those wondering, I also have >>> a 1.5.0 release of the archetype that uses Apache Accumulo 1.5.0 ready to >>> go. >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> - Josh >>> >>> > --bcaec501633f9fad0604e6b3749d--