accumulo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Billie Rinaldi <billie.rina...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Integration Tests
Date Fri, 13 Sep 2013 22:38:53 GMT
Right, downstream.

Well, I just turned off ITs yesterday, so the continuous integration in its
previous state was not enough to tip us off that things were broken. I'm
hoping configuring it for fewer emails will help.

Billie
On Sep 13, 2013 6:11 PM, "Michael Berman" <mberman@sqrrl.com> wrote:

> Do you mean downstream?  That seems reasonable to me.
>
> But it's hard to tell if they're building consistently when they're not
> being continuously built :-)
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 5:31 PM, Billie Rinaldi <billie.rinaldi@gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > I was considering making separate builds for the ITs upstream from the
> > non-IT builds. Or we could just turn ITs back on, if they're building
> > consistently.
> >
> > Billie
> > On Sep 13, 2013 5:16 PM, "Michael Berman" <mberman@sqrrl.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I have a new theory about why Jenkins is passing even though it looks
> to
> > me
> > > like integration tests couldn't possibly pass: It seems like Jenkins is
> > not
> > > running integration tests.
> > >
> > > Vines just took a look at the job config (which I can't see because I
> > don't
> > > have a jenkins account), and discovered that skipITs is set.  Is that
> > > deliberate?  Can we get them turned back on?  Even if they're excluded
> > from
> > > some jobs for speed, it seems like they should be turned on
> *somewhere*.
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message